I am happy for two reasons. I enjoy the Trumpenfreude of seeing him leave.
But I also laugh because the new management made a boner. He worked cheap and filled dead Sunday morning airtime for the channel. This is a foolish move. No one will say, well, now that they got rid of Stelter, I am going to watch CNN.
He was CNN's version of Liz Cheney, who also failed at her job and tried to cover it up by saying she answered to a higher calling. She sees herself as Lincoln. A reader said Liz was more like Mary Todd Lincoln, who went berserk during the Civil War.
Stelter was a down-market Howard Kurtz, the grand master of media navel-gazing. Kurtz had the show once but left CNN to do the same weekly rehash of journalism on Fox.
Evidently, Stelter's final show was a hoot. I didn't watch it because Carl Bernstein was on. No thank you.
Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor of The Atlantic, told Stelter, "You have to be willing to stand up to authority. You have to be willing to lose friends."
Few in the media will do that. Certainly not Goldberg or Stelter. Fox reported, "Here are 20 major media stories CNN's Brian Stelter ignored on his so-called media show in 2021."
But Stelter should ask himself, after years of being a good boy and parroting the party line, what did it get him?
Shelving Stelter's show was a corporate soap opera move. The guy who replaced Jeff Zucker is getting rid of all Zucker's loyalists. My guess is Jake Tapper will be next. Their sexual orientation should spare Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon.
The channel would be better off not changing a thing. CNN is not broken. I know this because the New York Times said it is broken.
NYT reported, "Profits Slump at CNN as Ratings Plummet.
"The network is on a pace to drop below $1 billion in profit for the first time in years, according to people familiar with its operations, amid steep declines in TV viewership."
Hahaha.
Oh no!
Not that!
Not profits falling below a billion. What will CNN do now? Maybe we should start a GoFundMe for CNN.
Its money mainly comes from cable subscription fees. Advertising is a sideline. Yes, people are cutting the cable cord but CNN is still raking the bucks in. CNN is a cash cow for its owner.
Nevertheless, NYT reported, "Ratings are down from their Trump-era heights across cable news, but declines at CNN are particularly pronounced. The network has drawn an average of 639,000 people in prime time this quarter, according to data from Nielsen, a 27% decrease from a year ago. It trails MSNBC, which is down 23% in prime time during the same period, and Fox News, where viewership is up about 1%.
"CNN has spent millions covering the war in Ukraine, two people familiar with its operations said, and the network is still paying some costs associated with CNN+, such as the salaries of high-profile journalists like Chris Wallace and Audie Cornish, which have also weighed on the bottom line.
"The network is trying to defray costs associated with CNN+ by selling some of the programming created for the streaming service to other providers, including HBO Max, which Warner Bros. Discovery also owns.
"Executives at CNN’s corporate parent are examining the media empire — which includes the Turner cable networks and channels like Food Network — to find roughly $3 billion in cost savings."
The best way to get to that $3 billion is to cut the expensive anchors in favor of the cheapos like Stelter.
Eventually, cable news will go the way of newspapers. The technology already is 50+ years old. Streaming services will suck up most of the customers in the next decade.
On top of that, news is boring. News Nation (formerly WGN) does straight news and it is painful to watch.
Fox flourishes because it is entertaining. Tucker Carlson running the chyron (the headline at the bottom of the screen) of "Creepy Porn Lawyer" while he was interviewing Michael Avenatti is a legendary moment in TV right up there with Mary Tyler Moore laughing at the funeral of Chuckles the Clown.
Liberals lost their sense of humor long ago, so CNN can forget finding a Gutfeld or a Carlson.
CNN's best bet is to find a Duck Dynasty or an Ancient Aliens to fill airtime.
I suggest Real Housewives of Kyiv or Keeping Up With The Zelenskys.
Don't get me wrong. I love the departure of Stelter because he sucked. But unless CNN has some hotshot reality show waiting in the wings, dumping him doesn't help its ratings or its bottom line that much.
As you put in the article, the Communist News Network doesn't need any of ratings to help the bottom line, just keep raking in the subsidies from the cable companys. Until the cable companys are forced to allow customers to choose each and every channel, this bullshifft will continue.
ReplyDeleteI cut the cable cord 9 yrs ago because of bundling. They force one to subsidize CNN & MSLSD in order to get FOX. I refuse to pay for programming with hosts whom I despise.
DeleteHPB
How about:''Hunter and the big Guy"?
ReplyDeleteThe Big Guy would have to get his 10%.
Delete"...Mr. Licht; a Mr. Bernard Shaw is on hold, on your '80's line, sir." zb.
ReplyDeleteBack in the 70s, in between editorials calling for placing carbon black on the Arctic to ward off the coming ice age, mother earth news serialized a book, four arguments for the elimination of television. I found them much more compelling than their cure for climate.
ReplyDeleteAbout six years back, I got stuff out of my Texas storage, and came across those issues(about tv) and pulled them out to read at night on drive back.
They were totally spot on still, and confirmed my judgement on eliminating tv from my life during bush Sr years. There's a reason even Hollywood refers to the product it sells to the American people as "programming."
I have a library card, and I prefer to program myself, thank you very much.
Truth be told, moving Antarctica off the south pole would do much more to warm the earth, and their chances of that are on par with controlling the Earth's climate.
A little song,
ReplyDeleteA little dance,
No more of Stelter's
High pitched rants.
-LG
I wonder if cancelling a show is the way to avoid a contract dispute. Also, signals that CNN is going to start losing clowns and end the circus as we know it.
ReplyDeleteActually, getting rid of all the Lefties - and going Roger Ailes - might just get people to watch again.
ReplyDeleteA forlorn hope, maybe, but, at this point, what difference does it make?
The scary thing about the spam postings such as the above, "Everybody will earn 5 hundred usd Daily… YES!", is the way inflation's going it's probably true.
ReplyDeleteAlso five hundred bucks just might be enough to buy you a Big Mac as long as you tell them to hold the fries.
OOPS, Don, or his program, panned the span I was referring to.
DeleteMy program consists of me deleting spam by hand when I have a spare minute. A nuisance but it is a price I pay for opening comments
DeleteThank you for THIS service, Don!
DeleteGlad you've reopened comments
DeleteMaybe they will expand Reverend Al’s show to two hours. Hell, make it three. He is un-fireable. Make him work for it. Maybe he’ll quit.
ReplyDeleteHe ate the last Krispy Kreme in the box one too many times.
ReplyDeleteApparently he is a pain in the ass and trouble maker at CNN. So they got rid of him for that. Truth is CNN should fired the lot, rehire some talent slightly right of Fox (not terribly difficult to do). That would improve its ratings if they don't change in 3 months.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget that a lot of CNN's revenues come from airports where passengers ignore it as best as possible.
ReplyDeleteMy pay at least $300/day.My co-worker says me!I'm really amazed because you really help people to have ideas how to earn money. Thank you for your ideas and I hope that you'll achieve more and receive more blessings. I admire your Website I hope you will notice me & I hope I can also win your paypal giveaway.
ReplyDelete………………livejob247
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
ReplyDeleteHERE====)> πππ.ππππππ ππ.πππ