All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Friday, July 01, 2022

Justices stood up to the mob. LGBT is next

Imagine a mob of angry villagers outside your home. Imagine how your children inside feel. Imagine how easy it would be to go along with the crowd.

It was Gary Cooper time at the Supreme Court corral.

But they weren't armed with only a gun and a sheriff's badge. This wasn't a movie. They were armed only with black robes and that piece of parchment we like to call the Constitution.

5 brave men and a mom stood up to the mob. There is a reason they call the Mafia the mob. Mobs use intimidation to get their way. Nice window you have there. It would be a shame if someone threw a brick through it. Wet my beak and I will make sure nobody does that.

Not only did they uphold the Mississippi abortion law but they struck down an unconstitutional gun law in New York, allowed a high school football coach to pray on a football field, and told the EPA no, you cannot shut the coal industry down without the express written permission of Congress.

They did so despite the courthouse being behind gates. I suppose they had an encampment of soldiers outside the courthouse during the Civil War.

I can wax poetic about their heroism but we are a forward looking people.

Conservatives swept the World Series in 4 games.

Celebrate but prepare for October.

Bloomberg reported, "Harvard Affirmative Action, Gay Rights Cases Are Next Up at Supreme Court."

By affirmative action, Bloomberg means discrimination against qualified Asian-American students to enroll less qualified African-American students.

The case should be a slam-dunk end to affirmative action, which was sold to the public as reparations in the 1970s. It is as unconstitutional as separate but equal, which was the law of the land thanks to an 8-1 Supreme Court decision in 1896. The Earl Warren Court threw stare decisis out the window and ended that discrimination in the schools case in 1954.

20 years later, discrimination returned, this time favoring blacks.

Bloomberg spun it, "For years, universities have been able to take race into account in their admissions process, which the Supreme Court affirmed in a 2003 decision. But the current court agreed to take up challenges to admission policies at Harvard College and the University of North Carolina. 

"A special interest group called Students for Fair Admissions accused Harvard of favoring Black and Hispanic applicants over Asian Americans. Lawrence Bacow, Harvard’s president, has said eliminating race as a factor would make it more challenging for the school to create a diverse student body. In the North Carolina case, the Supreme Court took the rare step of intervening before a trial judge’s decision made it to the appellate level."

A university should be about learning and research, not diversity.

Bloomberg made a big deal about the First Black Woman Justice joining the court. But the substitution of an old white man (Breyer) with a young black woman (Jackson) shouldn't change the vote.

Two more upcoming cases caught my eye.

Colorado forcing a Christian woman to do the bidding of a gay couple is on the docket.

The feds disallowing a woman to build a house under the Clean Water Act is on the docket.

My guess is the justices will tell Harvard, Colorado and the feds no because the court already smacked down Colorado and the feds in similar cases. 

I have faith in the court now because 6 justices stared down a liberal mob. 

16 comments:

  1. Great read , Don . My faith in our system has least slowed its downward spiral .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point. It will take a lot more to restore faith in the courts. Faith in government is a dead monster rotting in the alley though.

      Delete
    2. I am making $92 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience mass freedom now that I'm my non-public boss.
      That is what I do.. Www.Profit97.Com

      Delete
  2. The Stones classic, modified…

    And they put up with the demonstrations
    They took their fair share of abuse
    Morons chanting "We're gonna vent our frustration
    If we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse"
    Sing it to me, fat cow
    You can't always get what you want
    You can't always get what you want
    You can't always get what you want
    But if you try sometimes, well, you just might find
    You get what you need
    Ah baby, yeah

    ReplyDelete
  3. 5.5 or 5.75. Not completely sold on Roberts. Remember, he only supported part of the Mississippi decision, not the nullification of Roe. And was he the source
    Of the leak?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes it was so refreshing to finally see some adults that have actual clout stand up and kick the liberals fraudsters right where it hurts. Justice Gorsuch specifically mention “we do not rule with a pen and a phone“ Swatting down Obama right in the chop’s

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barry Soetoro is looking for his revenge. He needs to be deported back to Jakarta.

      Delete
  5. 6 1/2. Robert's doesn't count as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Like the libs will obey the law.


    New York would require people applying for a handgun license to turn over a list of their social media accounts so officials could verify their “character and conduct” under a bill being considered Friday by the state Legislature. https://t.co/fBZESSF0O1
    The Associated Press (@AP) July 2, 2022


    Can't find it at the moment but the epa put out a statement that sounds suspiciously like "Screw you SC, we'll do what we want".

    ReplyDelete
  7. I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…
    AND GOOD LUCK.:)
    HERE====)>

    ReplyDelete
  8. I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…
    AND GOOD LUCK.:)
    HERE====)> WWW.RICHSALARY.COM

    ReplyDelete
  9. As was predicted the NYS just passed a law which nullified the SC decision. It is even HARDER now to exercise your right to protect yourself in NYS. NYS is a slave state now. The SC decision did not go far enough. If protecting yourself is a 2nd amendment right why do we need a PERMIT to exercise that right?
    They addressed a slice of the concealed carry fascism eradicating a need to justify a LICENSE to conceal and carry but you still need a license to carry and a permit to own in NYS. Now they made it even harder. If our 2A right are equal with all our other rights why do we still need PERMISSION to exercise them?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Don't forget the decision about school funding in Maine. The court held that withholding tuition assistance from religion affiliated schools was unconstitutional. This decision has far reaching implications. It was a bullet to heart of the "Freedom From Religion" zealots.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I earn a good salary from home between $ 1,300 and $ 2,600 a week, which is amazing because a year ago I was unemployed in a terrible economy. I thank God every day that I was blessed with these instructions, and now it is my duty to pay for it further and share it with everyone. Here's what I do .——- https://www.site.slate74.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Not only did they uphold the Mississippi abortion law but they struck down an unconstitutional gun law in New York, allowed a high school football coach to pray on a football field, and told the EPA no, you cannot shut the coal industry down without the express written permission of Congress."

    The coach was trying to force his players into joining him, the EPA has the federal right to control emissions as the environment crosses state lines, and the justices lied about their belief about Roe v. Wade being settled, essentially comitting perjury:

    "Colorado forcing a Christian woman to do the bidding of a gay couple is on the docket."

    You mean deny gays services because they are gay?
    https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/07/28/lorie-smith-graphic-designer/

    And no, it isn't anymore a "lifestyle" than being black: https://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764

    ReplyDelete