All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Friday, November 20, 2020

Cucker Tarlson sells out



As Fox News slides into its new CNN lite format, some conservatives are in denial. But Tucker, they cry. They will boycott the rest of Fox -- except for Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham.

That's like giving up alcohol for Lent except for beer, wine, and bourbon.

Its prime time shows are its biggest moneymakers. Giving up Cavuto or some other minor show means nothing to Fox. The big money is in prime time. That is why they call it prime time.

And Carlson is laughing at his conservative viewers now. Last night, Carlson crapped on Sidney Powell for not going on his show and proving the president's case.

Who does he think he is? Chief Justice Tucker Carlson?

Ryan Saavedra reported, "Carlson said that he repeatedly tried to bring her on the show, offered to give her the entire hour to talk, and that she allegedly became angry and told his show to stop contacting her after they continued to ask for evidence."

How dare she tell him to take a hike.

So Carlson trashed her in his monologue.

He said, "So we invited Sidney Powell on this show, we would’ve given her the whole hour, we would’ve given her the entire week actually and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention — that’s a big story. But she never sent us any evidence despite a lot of requests, polite requests, not a page. When we kept pressing she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people with positions of authority, they told us Powell has never given them any evidence of either, nor has she provided any today at the press conference. Powell did say electronic voting is dangerous and she’s right, but she never demonstrated a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another, not one.

"So why are we telling you this? We’re telling you this because it’s true. In the end, that’s all that matters, the truth. It’s our only hope, it’s our best defense. It’s how we are different from them. We care what’s true and we know you care too. That’s why we told you. Maybe Sidney Powell will come forward soon with details on exactly how this happened in precisely who did it — maybe she will, we are certainly hopeful that she will. What happened with the vote counting this month and at polling places in Detroit and the polling places in Philadelphia and a so much else actually matters. It matters no matter who you voted for, no matter whether or not you think this election is over. Until will know the answers to those questions conclusively and we can agree on them, this country will not be healed."

According to Carlson, the country won't heal unless Sidney Powell goes on his show.

Geez, even Bill O'Reilly at his zenith was not this insufferable.

(And if there is one thing we bloggers at eponymous blogs know, it is oversized egos.)

Powell has better things to do, such as prepare a Supreme Court case.

This is why people give press conferences: so they don't have to explain the same thing over and over again in 10 different interviews.

Carlson knows this. He is using this refusal to answer His Summons as an excuse to distance himself from the president and his supporters.

You know what would be refreshing? Having Democrats come on Carlson's show where he would grill them about the living dead voters and 3 AM dumps of 100,000 ballots all marked for Biden.

But booking a Democrat on his show would be difficult because Democrats prefer to work behind the scenes at Fox.

And face it, he is scared. If Fox dumped O'Reilly who built that time slot, Fox will not hesitate to dump Carlson.

Which explains why Carlson who stood up to the Conservative Establishment 4 years ago has hopped off the Trump Train.

What he does not recognize is that we have been Cheatfeated, not defeated. It will be in the hands of the Supreme Court, and not the media's paws. And I would rather Sidney Powell proved it to the 6 Old Men and 3 Old Ladies there.

UPDATE: Via Citizen Free Press, Sidney Powell went on Fox Business and replied, "No, I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence.

"In fact, I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation, and I offered him another witness who could explain the math and the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person.

"He was insulting, demanding and rude, and I told him not to contact me again, in those terms."

Also, I changed the headline to Cucker Tarlson as a nod to a comment.

112 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Replies
    1. I think he sold out for the 10 million he gets paid. Same with Sean and with Laura. When it comes to principles with those three, money talks ... the rest of us boycott.

      Delete
    2. Laura never brought on Dr Savage as promised

      Delete
    3. Tucker is worried that ANTIFA may come and kick in his door AGAIN!!!
      Either way he has been assimilated!
      Hannity, like Samson before him, now stands alone against the Philistines....

      Delete
  3. I used to think these people at Fox News actually believed what they said. Turns out they are just reading from a script and the people writing those scripts have gone to the dark side.

    Kristen Fischer really surprised me yesterday. Right after the big press meeting she stood there and said there was no evidence of wrong doing. Sheesh! Fox News has been totally trashed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with what you said, but Kristen has been antiTrump forever. She is Cavuto’s go to to trash Trump.

      Delete
    2. I agree with your statement about plenty of evidence. Have they proved their case, not yet, but they haven’t presented the entire case either.

      Just a AP does not have the authority to declare Mr. Biden the winner, the media does not have the power to rule on the evidence.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, I saw that clip of Kristen. Very disappointing to see a young woman, who might have had a brilliant future, flat-out lying like that.

      Whenever I see her again, I'll know that whatever she says can't be trusted. Sad, that she has branded herself a liar for a mere salary.

      It reminds me of the old joke, whose punchline is, "we know what you are, now we're bargaining over the price." For me, no sale!

      Delete
  4. A controlled opposition is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries. Notably Vladimir Lenin who said ''"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tucker is within his rights as a journalist to request proof. Sidney Powell is within her rights to not disclose any information until the case is presented to the court. The other side would love to get this information and begin the discrediting process and front run her. All is well at this point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ultimately the media types want "copy" - so that they can attract viewers and get high ratings.

      But this often conflicts with the needs of legal proceedings.

      S.P. was a federal prosecutor for ten years. She knows that she has to keep everything admissible - even if (quelle horreur!) that means not putting stuff out in public too soon and thus having it tossed out by the courts.

      I'll trust an attorney rather than a media personality in things like this.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Snowgander. While I would be very interested in seeing proof, if it is necessary to hold it back until it can be presented in the proper forum I will trust in Ms. Powell. I hope she doesn't let me down.

      Delete
    3. Of course, no experienced attorney is going to lay out their plaintiff case before they go to court. Generalities and limited information will have to suffice. Why tell the opposing attorneys your complaints and evidence and allow them to begin a defense?
      I watched Tucker make an ass of himself, and shut it off. Now Fox is totally removed from my cable lineup

      Delete
    4. @Snowgander: Idk about trusting an attorney per se, but I trust Sidney Powell more than anyone in the media and believe her account of what happened more than TC's.

      Delete
    5. SPOT ON, and Tucker knows that.

      Delete
    6. It appears to me that Lawyer Powell is over the target.

      Delete
  6. Tucker always has been and always will be a pompous a$$. A WFB he will never be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's EXACTLY who he is, WFB was just as much controlled opposition as Cucker is.

      Delete
  7. Big D self-deprecates! Funny and damned refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Love the term “cheatfeated.” Well done!

    Why would Sidney Powell reveal to Tucker and the democrats her legal strategies? Tucker must know this but seems to be making a play for Faux’s new loony liberal viewers.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except it doesn't seem Fox has new loony liberal viewers. They're just bleeding their audience base.

      Delete
    2. Eleanor - at this point, I don’t think a tourniquet will help Fox.

      Delete
    3. S.L. Around the neck maybe. Put it out of it's misery.

      Delete
  9. Sydney Powell called in to the Maria Bartiromo show this morning and called Cucker Tarlson a liar. Said she offered him a material witness that signed an affidavit under oath to come on his show. Cucker is now dead to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maria Bartoromo, Lou Dobbs and Jim Varney seem to be the best friends Conservatives have on Fox. Fox Business.

      Delete
    2. These 3 all made their bones somewhere else. And they are on the business channel. They just have Cavuto-the-xxto in the middle to stink up the day.

      Delete
    3. And Maria, Lou and Jim need to get the hell out of there as soon as possible.

      Delete
  10. cross posted at https://freedomaustralia.freeforums.net/thread/426/tucker-carlson-sidney-powell-show

    ReplyDelete
  11. Give me an attorney who holds her cards close to her vest until it's time to lay them on the legal court's table any day of the week. Those who seek to try cases in the court of public opinion usually have a thin or no case at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And Rudy Giuliani. He seems to think Fox viewers are the ones who need convincing.

      Delete
  12. I saw the program and took away a different thought. Seems to me that TC has been watching and commenting on Russian collusion bs for four years and will not simply accept claims unbacked by visible evidence, even though they are made by perfectly trustworthy people. I could be wrong. I think I'm not.

    ReplyDelete
  13. And Kevin Williamson at NR. What’s really scarier than Dems cheating to win. Is that Dems might actually have won. Think about the implications of that. They successfully took control of our institutions meant to protect us and destroyed us.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I enjoy and appreciate Tucker's commentary too much to hang him from a high tree on the basis of one episode.
    He's a smart guy. I don't know the motivation for his bit on "let's see the evidence" but he had to know that it would not go down well with his typical audience.
    I'll cut him some slack until/unless it appears that he's permanently abandoned the tv persona that made him popular with conservatives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are about to be sorely disappointed.

      Delete
    2. It must be so nice to be able to tell the future....

      Delete
    3. If you really notice he hasn't been speaking of the election at all. He took his 30 pieces of silver and announced such when he said he wasn't going anywhere in fact he was expanding at Fox. Bye bye.

      Delete
    4. If you really notice he hasn't been speaking of the election at all. He took his 30 pieces of silver and announced such when he said he wasn't going anywhere in fact he was expanding at Fox. Bye bye.

      Delete
    5. If you really notice he hasn't been speaking of the election at all. He took his 30 pieces of silver and announced such when he said he wasn't going anywhere in fact he was expanding at Fox. Bye bye.

      Delete
  15. Tucker is the best real journalist left on TV. He makes a valid point. Sydney Powell has made the most serious accusations of a generation. To date, she has indeed offered no real evidence. A statistical anomaly is just that until someone demonstrates conclusively the cause of the anomaly. Tucker is merely holding the right to the same standards to which he held Schiff et all over the last four years. Thank God there is at least one journalist like that out there.

    I find it interesting that Powell's rebuttal essentially fell back to "I'm not a numbers person." Seriously? Right now our blogosphere has convinced she must be holding the goods for her day in court. I hope that is true, because all I see with regard to the hardware/software allegation is theory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Disagree. When numerous statistical anomalies are beyond the range of possibility and are anchored in facts (actual tabulated votes) that is evidence that the impossible did not occur in the real world. Now I'd prefer electronic or paper trails leading back to the criminals, but I'll wait. And Sidney is tactically right to hold that back until the last minute.

      Delete
    2. SP is under NO obligation to go on Tucker's show and present her evidence. that's what the COURTS are for.

      Delete
  16. Now, here is Sidney's side:

    "Sidney Powell: No, I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence in fact I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation and I offered him another witness who could explain the mathematics of the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person. But he was very insulting, demanding and rude and I told him not to contact me again in those terms."

    From: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/insulting-demanding-rude-told-never-contact-sidney-powell-goes-off-tucker-carlson-video/

    Now, who are you going to believe? Tucker? Or, Sidney Powell? I know who I believe. And it ain't the one with a show who requires controversy to help his ratings in order to sell ads and make money. Cough, Tucker, cough.

    Tucker is done. Any conservative who watches him now is a cuckservative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tucker relies on his producers and he may have a problem with them. We'll see how he responds to her reply. It would be nice if she had an audio recording of the call from his producer/booker. Many news reports are just readers repeating what some, maybe young left producers, are writing.

      Delete
    2. Tucker has a problem. He sold out his conscience and his ethics for millions of FOX-QUISLING dollars. And he knows it. And he's toast.

      Delete
  17. Oh, and Tucker, there are lots of computer experts on the internet, who can show the vote moving, using the live feed from the NYT on election night. I believe it is still out there, and they give a link to it. I've seen one guy show in several states the actual taking of votes. So, this is not some conspiracy theory. The proof is out there Tucker, if you bothered to look. But, he'd rather make controversy out of his poor reaction to Sidney's response, so he can now attract more dumbocrats to his show, to replace the real conservatives that rightly have dumped him. He really jumped the shark here. His problem, not mine.

    By the way, if the NYT was receiving that live feed of votes, does anyone doubt that Trump, and his administration was intercepting that feed also? So, even if he does not have the servers, and I do believe he does have them, he still has the live vote feed. That raw vote feed, is where I believe that 410 Electoral Map that shows the Trumpslide, probably came from. Hello NSA!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fully agree with Florida Man. Shite, the LibCommies are officially denying stuff that HAPPENED, like the MAGA guy in DC getting cold-cocked by the BLAMTIFA pervert. Whaddaya want, Tuck, a computer audit trail? Oh you mean like the username/time stamp stuff Sundance has put together re Deep State collusion that you breezed past? Tuck, you fooking tool.

      Delete
    2. Well, as Rudy Gulianni stated, the press should be stunned that our votes get sent to another country for processing. Yet, crickets from them, including Cucker. Unbelievable how bad the press is right now. So many of all ages, are uninformed due to our awful, leftist MSM. Now, it includes Cucker.

      On the other hand, everyone can openly see the sides being chosen.

      Delete
    3. FLO - spot on. I am trying not to pay too much attention to this, but even I have seen the people detailing the actual taking of votes. They don’t see what they don’t want to see.

      Delete
    4. Now, according to this:

      https://mobile.twitter.com/anonpatriotq/status/1329820916373725187

      "Sidney Powell just now on Glenn Beck:

      Servers from ScytI in Germany were in fact confiscated and "I AM HEARING THAT IS WAS OUR FORCES THAT GOT THE SERVERS."

      This is now different from her answer at the press briefing yesterday, where she claimed she didn't know if the good guys had the servers or the bad guys had them.

      Those bazturds are caught now. As I said, I'm sure the Trump administration was intercepting those Dominion feeds across the Atlantic to the servers overseas (hello NSA, where the Smartmatix routines "fixed" the votes. And, now, the revalation that the servers are in the good guy's hands, which means they can pinpoint the vote fraud.

      There is no way Biden will be POTUS. It's just a matter of time before the election results for Biden are nullified, as they have the raw vote feed prior to the manipulation. And from what has been leaked, is a massive Trumpslide, showing that Blacks and Latinos voted in record numbers for Trump. No way Biden gets close without a high turnout of those two. Plus, Trump increased his white votes too. The sooner this gets out, the sooner this nation can move on and prosecute those involved.

      Delete
    5. Trump signed an Executive Order in 2018, that made integrity of Elections "critical
      infrastructure", so it's protected by the military. Does anyone else not see this as a legitimate justification for Trump to spy on the incoming Biden administration? There is now collusion with a foreign entity too. Oh, would that be great or what? I can hear the squeals of the leftist MSM when it is revealed that damning information was gleaned through military surveillance on the Biden administration's activities. This is a great time to be alive, and witness this.

      Delete
  18. One more link. For those intetested, here is a link listing the growing evidence of the massive vote fraud:

    https://hereistheevidence.com/

    Any troll that comes here spouting the leftist MSM lie that there is no evidence, is lying. Just ignore the trolls. But, you can respond by laughing at them.

    ReplyDelete
  19. After Barrister Powell has presented her case to the court, she should punish Tucker’s arrogance by giving an exclusive to NewsMax TV, laying out all the evidence that Tucker has been browbeating her to provide.

    OAN would be a good choice also, but until they either stop charging a monthly fee to watch — or at least give a week’s free trial — they will not surpass NewsMax as Fox’s replacement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Should give the exclusive to Kennedy on Fox Business on same time as Cucker.

      Delete
  20. I don't always agree with Tucker and nor do I on this. Ms. Powell gave leads such as the software was used to change the Argentina election at some point. Has his producers or any journalists checked out this story. It would confirm or not what Ms. Powell has said. Saying what she said is suspect because she will not provide more answers is not what I would call journalism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a signed affidavit from a former military officer who lives here now, but was in Venezuela when the software was developed, and used to ensure Chavez stayed ruler, and also help Maduro win. I believe he also stated that it was exported to Argentina too. Maybe that was the affidavit Powell was referring to when she said she offered to send one to Cucker that explains how the process works. Maybe not, but, she offered him some evidence, and Cucker refused.

      Delete
  21. Correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to remeber Tucker in a "never Trump phase back in 2015/16..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was not the only one. I was a Cruz guy because Trump promised much and elected officials usually ignore their promises. His actions change me to him later, but I still wish his Tweets were a little more civil.

      Delete
    2. Well Cruz lost me when he BeBecked himself. there was a reason Trump didn't answer Beck's phone calls.

      Delete
    3. Cruz lost me when he, along with all the other RINO squishes, refused to defend Trumps planned Chicago rally in 2016. Trump cancelled because of the the explicit threat of violence. Cruz proved then that he was just another pandering slimeball politician. He talks a great game, but when it comes to putting it on the line, he's not there.

      Delete
  22. 2013

    Rupert Murdock orders his minions to support the gang of 8 immigration amnesty bill. Hannity, O'Reilly, Tucker (Daily Caller) all fall in. I remember O'Reilly saying that if you don't support the bill you are a "pinhead"

    Then Dave Brat defeats Majority Leader Eric Cantor in the Virginia Republican House primary and the House Republicans run scared.
    Dave Brat's voters saved us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. That was a critical moment in our Republic. Yet, that still didn't stop them. Under Obumbles, they let in caravans of illegals, and distributed them across the country, in areas deplorables live. Many of them carrying diseases that this country hadn't seen in decades. It was truly despicable.

      Delete
  23. I did think he overreacted as no lawyer wants to telegraph their evidence and their plans to their opponents and give them time to come up with ways to stop them.

    Plus talking about it on TV means nothing. It's not under oath so no one who doesn't want to be convinced can just claim it's a lie so it would not help any at all.

    I wouldn't say Tucker has sold out but he may be getting concerned for his job and needs to produce viewers all the time. That's all I see in his reaction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think that it was an over reaction. They don't say anything on national TV that isn't scripted.

      Delete
  24. I'd say believing any corporate media represents the something other than maintaining the status quo is a fool's errand

    ReplyDelete
  25. Check out Deb Heine’s late-breaking article on Dominion at American Greatness.

    https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/20/dominion-voting-systems-lawyers-up-abruptly-backs-out-of-pa-state-house-fact-finding-hearing/

    Suck on THAT big long fat thing, Tuck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting how Cucker didn't seem interested in contacting any Dominion or Smartmatic people. Nothing to see there. Move along, right Cucker?

      Delete
  26. I was genuinely shocked by Tucker's comment about Sydney Powell and evidence as if he expects lawyers to put on their case in the media.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Explanation: He's a spoiled brat and in the last two weeks, he hasn't gotten his way. Hence his juvenile behavior (temper tantrum).

      Delete
  27. I was hopeful that Tucker Carlson would give me a reason to keep watching his program. Alas, he instead gifted me with the reason I no longer feel compelled to. You hit the nail on the head. I now have ZERO incentive to ever turn Fox News on again. I've even removed it from Alexa as my news source when asking "Alexa, what's new?"

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think this article takes it a little bit too far. The details of the case ARE important, and the public will eventually have to see them, so they can determine the credibility of the case for themselves. If Carlson was rude and demanding, then that would be a problem, but that does not mean that he is in the enemie's camp. I'll be honest, I would be in hog heaven if the arguments for election fraud are credible and proved in a court of law AND people are prosecuted and go to hail as a result. I would love to have Trump serve a second term....On the other hand, if this proves to be mostly political maneuvering, and a bunch of hot air, then there are a few Republicans that will also need to be in a lot of trouble. Truth needs to prevail; I hope this is substantive. Cut Tucker just a little slack; he is trying to get to the bottom of this, which is more than I can say for much of the rest of FOX News, and for ALL of the mainstreem media. OAN and NEWSMAX are on it too. I need to see substance and evidence; in the end, that is what will make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought Tucker was reasonable but can understand not showing your cards you hope to play in court. CHILL PEOPLE

      Delete
  29. Disagree on O'Reilly. He often taunted people for not wanting to come on his show. notable Angelina Jolie.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I think this article takes it a little bit too far. The details of the case ARE important, and the public will eventually have to see them, so they can determine the credibility of the case for themselves. If Carlson was rude and demanding, then that would be a problem, but that does not mean that he is in the enemie's camp. I'll be honest, I would be in hog heaven if the arguments for election fraud are credible and proved in a court of law AND people are prosecuted and go to hail as a result. I would love to have Trump serve a second term....On the other hand, if this proves to be mostly political maneuvering, and a bunch of hot air, then there are a few Republicans that will also need to be in a lot of trouble. Truth needs to prevail; I hope this is substantive. Cut Tucker just a little slack; he is trying to get to the bottom of this, which is more than I can say for much of the rest of FOX News, and for ALL of the mainstreem media. OAN and NEWSMAX are on it too. I need to see substance and evidence; in the end, that is what will make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He lied to his viewers about what happened between Ms Powell and himself. No slack for the Cucker.

      Oh, and here is a good article on Ms Powell. A lady of impeccable character.

      https://stream.org/i-know-sidney-powell-she-is-telling-the-truth/

      Cucker has nothing on her.

      Delete
  31. I think this article takes it a little bit too far. The details of the case ARE important, and the public will eventually have to see them, so they can determine the credibility of the case for themselves. If Carlson was rude and demanding, then that would be a problem, but that does not mean that he is in the enemie's camp. I'll be honest, I would be in hog heaven if the arguments for election fraud are credible and proved in a court of law AND people are prosecuted and go to hail as a result. I would love to have Trump serve a second term....On the other hand, if this proves to be mostly political maneuvering, and a bunch of hot air, then there are a few Republicans that will also need to be in a lot of trouble. Truth needs to prevail; I hope this is substantive. Cut Tucker just a little slack; he is trying to get to the bottom of this, which is more than I can say for much of the rest of FOX News, and for ALL of the mainstreem media. OAN and NEWSMAX are on it too. I need to see substance and evidence; in the end, that is what will make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. posting the same argument over and over does not make it true. Tucker sold us out, stop cucking for him.

      Delete
    2. I’ve heard if you post using firefox browser it may post the same thing three times.

      Delete
  32. I keep seeing comments about Powell supposedly not showing evidence to Tucker.

    No matter how important he believes himself to be, Tucker is not SCOTUS or one of the state supreme courts. Powell owes him nothing.

    She'll show "evidence in court, but her accusations have been very clear. If she's wrong, Dominion should easily be able to counter them in the same court of public opinion that Powell is being tried in.

    Interestingly, Dominion has run from the opportunity to clear its name at the PA state hearing. Nationwide free coverage. What honest business would turn down that opportunity? None.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She offered him an affidavit, and a better witness to explain the fraud. He rejected both. He lied to his viewers. No slack cut for the Cuck. Read the article I linked above about Ms Powell. You will find even more disgust for Cucker.

      Delete
  33. Let us not forget for whom Tucker works. Turns out he is a snake just like Ann Coulter only much more influential...until now. Trump is starting to make Alexander the Great look like a piker. In four years he has expose and in many cases neutered our rulers be they regulators, judges, media, military industrial complex and now election fraud.
    Keep on truckin' big guy!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Cucker Tarlson should go back to wearing a bowtie.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Never saw the show since we have no television, but wasn't this the man-boy with the bowtie? Did anyone miss that plea for recognition?

    ReplyDelete
  36. I see no reason for Sidney to trust Carlson any more than any of the rest of the dancing marionettes at FOX. They have proven that that their principles are for sale. I won't assume that they ever had any to begin with. We also have to consider if it was all fake from the very beginning and none of them do or say anything but what they are told. That said I have to wonder if Carlson is being held in reserve as the "Tucker Torpedo" to try and strike the fatal blow. At this point there is no duplicitious, and yes TREASONOUS move by. FOX or any of them that would surprise me in the least.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Carlson is hedging his bets. If, God Forbid, Biden is inaugurated, Tucker doesn't want to have to move his family to Antarctica, which may be the only safe place on the planet for American anti-communists. Carlson like the rest of them who want to keep their cushy jobs and their lives will take a HARD LEFT TURN.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Well at some point you have to produce evidence that will change the election and there is evidence but in small numbers, intent with failure does not change the election

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are either a troll, a lefty, or just plain ignorant. One more time. See the link, where many, many examples with source links are provided:

      https://hereistheevidence.com/

      Delete
    2. In the words of Bernie Taupin, “Comic book characters never grow old.”

      Delete
    3. That is a great double LP z. Good call.

      Delete
  39. I'm done. That disgusting hit job was worthy of CNN - why doesn't Cucker bring in Brian Alka-Steltzer to guest host.

    When I next have the urge to lick globalist turds out of rotting diapers, I will tune into Tucker again.

    What a total fraud smh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no welfare, please, don’t hold back. let us know what you really think... lmfao.

      Delete
  40. And the reason Sydney Powell or anyone else needs to kiss the low life media's ring, is what exactly. Who died and made the cheesy media whores lord over anything. We will win this fight. The cheesy FOX prostitutes' can just go sell their talent on the curb where it came from and where it belongs.

    ReplyDelete
  41. About Sydney Powell

    "You're a damned good man, sister"

    - Sam Spade to Effie Perine in The Maltese Falcon


    You can't say that about the tiny hermaphroditic worm Cucker Tarlson *spit*

    ReplyDelete
  42. Nobody likes a traitor, and that be what Cucker is.
    He done shot off his feet with a 105-mm howizter.
    In the title of a song by George Thorogood, "Get A Haircut, And Get A Real Job."

    ReplyDelete
  43. Bottom line is that humanity sucks. Nothing new under the sun.

    ReplyDelete
  44. LOOK, IDIOTS, IF YOU HAVE A JOB AT ANY MSM OUTLET AND CAN GET YOUR BOOK PUBLISHED WHENEVER YOU WANT, YOUR IN THE BIG CLUB. BONGINO JUST FUCKED EVERYBODY TO. THINK LOGICALLY THINK LOGICALLY THINK LOGICALLY YOU STUPIUD MF'ERS, IT'S A BIG CLUB AND WE AIN'T IN IT. STOP WATCHING NEWS ON TV, THEIR IN THE CLUB. Sorry for the tuff love harsh words folks, we're on the same, but you have to understand these self proclaimed elite ruling class are just playing the good cop bad cop on everybody.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Tucker Carlson was, for me, the bright spot at Fox. Now he’s just a phk. Phk-em.

    ReplyDelete
  46. TUCKER- et tu Brutus?
    Hard to comprehend that even our most aligned “allies” in the media will turn on us, especially in these trying times....
    Are Sean and Laura next ,on lay to save their behinds?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Tucker lost me. He coulda been somebody. Now he's Asleigh Banfield.

    ReplyDelete
  48. https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2018-49/weltwoche-international/trump-is-not-capable-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-49-2018.html
    The real Tucker Carlson in an interview he gave to a Swedish paper.

    ReplyDelete

  49. https://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2018-49/weltwoche-international/trump-is-not-capable-die-weltwoche-ausgabe-49-2018.html

    ReplyDelete
  50. Don't let "the perfect be the enemy of the very good".
    The verdict is still out on Tucker. I was concerned too about his Sydney Powell comments, but bear in mind that these top 3 anchors are under severe pressure right now. We don't yet know how everything is going to play out, and how do you tread a line between having a complete VOID of conservative presence on a major network, versus being dismayed about a particular call he made on one topic. Maybe he was trying to show what he thought would be even-handedness but missed the mark a bit.
    My choice is I'd rather have an anchor that is 90% correct than no anchor at all.
    I remain grateful for all the indisputable good Tucker has done and on balance consider his voice a very helpful one.
    I doubt Tucker will ever turn out to be a cohort of this attempted Marxist coup. If it were to become clear that he is, I will be disappointed and change my mind. But we are still a long ways from that.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Thanks for this, Don. I was feeling conflicted, but you hit the nail squarely on the head: Tucker has no right to hear the evidence. Presenting it is a tedious, lengthy process and Sidney lives with it so much already that she is doubtless already tired of it. Tucker's giving himself airs of the sort Dan Rather did. Recall him saying, "It's not about me. Answer the question!" as if he were the boss. He wasn't the boss then and Tucker Carlson isn't the boss now.

    ReplyDelete
  52. I know Hannity is smart because he holds a pen between his fingers.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Hello everyone do you know that Investing online has been a main source of income,that's why knowledge plays a very important role in humanity,you don't need to over work yourself to earn money. All you need is the right information,and you could build your own wealth from the comfort of your home!Binary/crypto trading is dependent on timely signals,assets or controlled strategies which when mastered increases chance of winning up to 90%-100% with trading. It’s possible to earn around $7,000 to $14,000 trading weekly - monthly.
    Qbicmarkets.com now happens to be the ideal platform that offers you just that .reach out to (Dejaellie@gmail.com ) for Assistance
    She was the one who guides me to my financial breakthrough with her masterclass strategy, I had to share this with everyone through this medium because of the hard times the world is facing right now. Stop complaining an make a move, change your life once and for all. Let's talk Success/prosperity and not bad news all the time! 💪💪💪
    Share this to family and friends.
    Change lives positively.

    ReplyDelete
  54. "Jim" Varney was the dude who played "Ernest" in the movies and TV commercials. I think you mean "Stuart" Varney, who is actually a really cool dude.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I enjoy Stuart. When the stock market is having a big up day Stuart can not hide his greed. He almost pees himself. He's OK but just another mannequin. Investment talk on TV is OK, but don't bet the farm on the talking heads advice, they may have an agenda of their own. Mainly they can read and talk for an hour and keep a reasonable demeanor. It is a valuable skill, but not one you would want to put your faith in. A good place for general ideas, but not professional investment advice by any stretch.

      Delete