All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Friday, September 27, 2019

You do not want Trump on the stand



Presidential impeachment fever this week replaced Justice Kavanaugh as the media ignores the news to report whatever bauble happens to attract Washington's attention. But the Holy Grail for the media is the impeachment of President Donald John Trump. The oligarchs of news would love to put him on the witness stand under oath.

Just like Megyn Kelly once did.

She relished questioning Donald Trump in the first Republican debate in 2015. A former prosecutor, the media considered her a top notch interviewer who could bring powerful men down because in the matriarchal world they imagine as a utopia, men deserve ridicule.

So sure that she was the one who could slay this dragon, she came in although she was pretty sick. She kept a bucket on hand in case she had to puke on stage.

He destroyed her in 3 words.
KELLY: Mr. Trump, one of the things people love about you is you speak your mind and you don’t use a politician’s filter. However, that is not without its downsides, in particular, when it comes to women. You’ve called women you don’t like “fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals.”
(LAUGHTER)
TRUMP: Only Rosie O’Donnell.
(LAUGHTER)
Then there was the debate in which Jeb! Bush defending his mother, saying she was a saint.

Donald Trump destroyed him in 3 words, "She should run."

Then there was the debate in which Hillary attacked his temperament and said she was glad he was not president.

Donald Trump destroyed her in 5 words, "Because you'd be in jail."

In each case, the media reported that the victim bested him, and in each case the public saw it otherwise because Trump made a point that went direct to the viewer.

1. The women he calls names deserve it.

2. Jeb! Bush is a mama's boy.

3. Obama spared Hillary from prison.

Kelly is gone from the airwaves. Jeb! and the Bush Dynasty are over. Hillary is wandering the Earth in a tent dress muttering about losing.

And Donald Trump is still president. Democrats still underestimate him. They still think they are smarter than he is. They continue to fool themselves into thinking they are his superiors, moral and otherwise.

Peggy Noonan's latest column was headlined, "Democrats Set a Bear Trap."

Do they really want to be in the same room as a bear? Especially this bear.

102 comments:

  1. CONFIRMED: White House says lawyers directed moving Ukraine transcript to highly secure system

    The White House is forced to admit this because the evidence is already being collected.

    While you're busy trying to explain what happened an hour ago, three more problems have blown up in Trump's face.

    And while you're trying to make excuses for this, ten more things will happen while Trump loses control.

    Put him on the stand. Do it. He's a clown, and he only impresses the maga crowd.

    We're taking him down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! Adam Schiff for brains hits again. The first one. He can't help himself, because he allows Surber and Trump to live rent free in his head.

      So, now it's "Trump loses control." Ha ha. Good one Adam Schiff for brains. I'll add that to "the walls are crashing down."

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. A secure server like that is what government rules dictate. Contrast that to Hillary's server in her home bathroom. The Corrupt Human Turd is still free.

      Delete
    3. White House lawyers instructed them to do so Wile E. Coyote. Talk about a nothingburger with nothingcheese.

      Delete
    4. Please explain what is wrong about saving conversations with foreign leaders on a secure server?

      Since Trump voluntarily took the unprecedented step of releasing the document on that secure server to everyone in the world to read, where's the cover up?

      Remember, Clinton had to be subpoenaed to turn over the emails every other Sec of State voluntarily made available but first violated the subpoena by deleting the most personally damaging 33,000. Now THAT'S a cover up.

      Delete
    5. Of course they wanted it secure. The damned place leaked like a sieve. That was what anyone who does not have Schiff for brauns would do. The damage the leakers did to the ability to conduct foreign affairs is incalculable. What leader will speak honestly if it is all going to end upon the NY Fish Wrap.

      Delete
    6. I remember how the GOP in the 90's was convinced if they could just some proof against Bill Clinton he was toast. Finally, they got what they wanted. They caught him in a perjury trap and had incontrovertible proof that he lied under oath. They also got proof he couldn't keep his pants on.

      So they impeached him. When the smoke cleared, the GOP Speaker of the House (Gingrich) had to resign. So did his replacement (Livingstone). Bill Clinton stayed in office and had the highest approval ratings of his presidency. Last but not least, the Democrats gained seats in Congress in a midterm election for the first time since FDR was POTUS 60 years earlier.

      So go ahead, impeach Trump. I double-dog dare you.

      Delete
    7. Inexplicably, Al Gore distanced himself from the popular Bill Clinton when he ran to replace him. He did so on the advice of Donna Brazile.

      He did not allow Bill Clinton to campaign for him and repeated bashed Clinton in speeches.

      Al Gore lost by the narrowest of margins. He didn't even carry his own state.

      Delete
  2. Yeah, actually we do want Trump on the stand.

    Trump, this morning:

    "To show you how dishonest the LameStream Media is, I used the word Liddle’, not Liddle, in discribing Corrupt Congressman Liddle’ Adam Schiff. Low ratings
    @CNN
    purposely took the hyphen out and said I spelled the word little wrong. A small but never ending situation with CNN!"

    Go for it. Put that floundering turd muffin on national television and cross examine him.

    Do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Google liddle kidz you turd burglar.

      Delete
    2. Cat, meet laser pointer.

      Trump gets you every time.

      Delete
    3. Have you always had this problem?

      Delete
    4. You get pawned so often you should be on a chess board Nonny.

      Delete
  3. The secure server was used to preserve the transcripts from tampering by 'your people', asshole. This whole scenario was worked out weeks ago. Your square foot to shit the side walk is open now. Have at it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He tried to hide the evidence of a crime and got caught.

      We're taking him down.

      Delete
    2. If you say so, Hillary.

      Delete
    3. Hiding evidence on a secure government server to prevent leaks is why Democrats are putting us through another Hoax Shit Show.

      Delete
    4. You remind me of the meme where Donald Trump is videotaped at Walmart in a 10 or less takeout line with 12 items. Ya got him now!

      Delete
  4. Drugs are bad for you anon, I'd suggest getting right with Christ. The day of reckoning is almost at hand. B.S.G.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't believe in fairy tales about magical carpenters.

      Because I'm not a brainwashed kook.

      Delete
    2. Drugs are bad for you

      So you think your my mother?

      Delete
    3. Adam Schiff for brains wrote:

      "I don't believe in fairy tales about magical carpenters."

      Doubt that. But I do know, like your Dumbocrats, who feed the leftist media (BIRM) you see things that aren't there.

      Adam Schiff for brains continues:

      "Because I'm not a brainwashed kook."

      No. You are an insane brainwashed kook!

      FLOlson

      Delete
    4. Of course you don't believe in magical carpenters, just magical crystals, magical planets and constellations, magical earth mother, magical yoga positions, magical Swedish 16 year old prophets, magical 29 year old bartender saints and of course a magical ex-president who will prove his messiah cred by keeping the ocean from flooding his newly purchased $15 million dollar waterfront mansion when the seas overtake the rest of the earth in a mere 12 years. Or is it 11 now?

      Delete
    5. And yet you love to preach to us with misquotes from the Bible. Do you believe in evolution? Are you merely mutated pond scum? You sure act like it. Scum.

      Delete
    6. Mike H, you forgot magic mushrooms. Nonny loves his escape from reality.

      Delete
  5. Cartoon of Democrats standing inside the large propped up box as Trumpy bear sniffs around the outside.

    Caption: "Oh boy! We're gonna get him now!"

    -Mikey NTH

    ReplyDelete
  6. BREAKING

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says that if the House goes ahead and impeaches President Donald Trump, the Senate “has no choice” but to conduct a trial to determine whether the president is removed from office.

    McConnell is not going to prevent a trial to protect Trump.

    All of this would have been unthinkable 10 days ago. It's happening faster than you can react to it.

    We're taking him down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't wait for the trial! They will call Romney and Biden's son to the stand and expose their racketeering.

      Final witnesses will be Hillary and Barry. Ratings will go thru the roof.

      Delete
    2. Keep wishing, hoping Adam Schiff for brains. Meanwhile, you keep adding hits to your rentmaster's blog.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    3. McConnell said that several months ago. LOL. APNews corrected it.

      Delete
    4. https://apnews.com/2bc10ed20dbf4041935b37bec9542c53

      Delete
    5. We're taking him down. The only thing going down is your Mom on my pole.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. You can't take down your pants without help from your mommy.
      You fell for the Russia collusion hoax too and failed to learn a damn thing.
      Have a seat & take your pills,lunatic.

      Delete
    8. I thought you guys had him for sure when the media exposed the scandal that the stack of burgers at the White House dinner for the college football champions was not, in fact, a mile high.

      Delete
  7. Be careful for what you wish for Coward, Nonny..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump on trial televised live will be the best re-election ad ever.

      Delete
    2. Yes. Yes it would, lyn5. Yes it would. I hope the dumocrats try. So much popcorn, so little time.....

      Delete
  8. The idiocy is rampant. The Democrats KNOW they effed up. They have no other recourse but to go on.

    They are like the drug addict caught with dugs in their pants pocket.

    "These are not my pants!"

    Yeah, same thing.

    "This isn't my spying, my coup!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C'mon, tex!!!

      You know that the location your specified is not the location they deny!!!

      Sure, Don does not like certain facts of life blatantly stated here, Butt.......

      Delete
  9. Schiff and Nadler created the complaint a supportive CIA agent used to file a complaint.

    Schiff is well known, verified, for leaking, even while he is at seat in his official position in his committee.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The complaint is garbage full of lies and mistakes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aww, come on Texas, lighten up on Adam Schiff for brains. After all, he puts a lot of energy into reading the leftist media on his mummy's computer for the next part of their fantasy of Trump impeachment, and then running over here to post it. I can't wait to see what he comes up with to top the last one he posted. That Mitch is going to have an impeachment trial in the Senate. That was a good one!

      FLOlson

      Delete
  11. Does Trump have a history of providing testimony in lawsuits?

    How did those go?

    Donny has a terrible record on the stand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adam Schiff for brains, you sure are getting worked up over something that won't happen. But, that is your par for the course. Surber, your rent master, thanks you for another hit to his blog!

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. Trumpers think he can make Rosie O'Donnell jokes like that is some kind of masterful legal strategy.

      And they're so easily impressed they've convinced themselves this would be so hilarious it would work in a criminal trial.

      Maga maga maga lol.

      Delete
    3. It doesn't matter Adam Schiff for brains, as Trump will not be on trial. But you keep hoping, wishing, for the next "scandal" that will bring the walls crashing down. It's pathetic that you still fall for these FAKE NEWS! scandals over and over. But then, you've never shown you have any intelligence from the moment you posted here. All you do is give your rent master Surber's blog another hit.

      FLOlson

      Delete
  12. Am NOT privy to this information, but wouldn’t it be awesome if the Durham/Barr report came out in about 25 minutes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I refuse to get caught up in rumors, speculation, and what not. In other words, I don't want to repeat the actions of this blog's own troll, Adam Schiff for brains. Until I see hard, confirmed, warrants, I don't care. This whole coup has been documented by many blogs operated by smart, investigative writers, so the evidence is there. The peratrators are known. If they go unpunished, our Constitutional Republic is done.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. C'mon, flo blo!!!

      Tain't nuthin' dun 'till Americans say it's done!!!

      And Americans ain't sayin' yet.

      That will be said come November of 2020.

      Until then, this shit pit slime wrestling that the democrats be all frolicking in will provide so much amusement to all Americans.

      The democrats have suckered in the few truly obnoxious pro grifter repubs, who jump eagerly into the shit pit.

      The mittens, the lyin' ryan putz, the pontificating rinos all, desperate to restore obliviousness of their grifter natures to the electorate.

      Too fucking late.

      MAGA, via our Magnificient MAGA President, has driven them all out from behind their hiddy holes!!!

      No more bullshitting the American electorate, slimebag grifter by politics putz fcks!!!

      Too.

      Fucking.

      Late.


      All the wiggling, finnagling, hustling, bullshitting and fabricating is now for naught.

      Your putrid spunk is poisoning you.

      Delete
  13. House Democrats have issued impeachment inquiry subpoenas.

    Support for IMPEACHMENT up 12 points in 3 days.

    Conservatives still think it's all about Biden's kid.

    Hahahahaha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12 points? Whos poll? Oh yeah, your imaginary poll.

      More subpoenas Adam Schiff for brains? Why no vote for impeachment? Don't you have enough evidence yet? Hell, you've spent almost your entire afternoon here spewing the "evidence" your Dumbocrats fed you.

      All you have accomplishing with your time here is adding more hits to your rent master's blog.

      Pathetic.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Your obsession with blog hits is pretty funny.

      Nobody cares.

      Delete
    4. When you get a House vote on calling for an impeachment trial, by then, so many democrats will have been indicted that democrats will no longer have a majority in the House.

      Delete
    5. So what?

      Holder flat out told Congress to pound sand on their subpoenas.

      The Dems were going to do this no matter what.

      It goes along with the coup they are engaged in.

      Delete
    6. Adam Schiff for brains, ironically replies:

      "Your obsession with blog hits is pretty funny."

      It ain't my obsession. Your only contribution here, outside of entertainment, is that you are increasing the popularity of Surber's blog, and you are unaware of it.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    7. That's not how web traffic works.

      Run along now.

      Delete
    8. Yeah? Like you know how web traffic works.

      Keep hitting your rent master's blog Adam Schiff for brains.

      Meanwhile, please explain why there is no vote for impeachment in the House by now. Impeachment has been on the House's agenda since your predicted "blue wave". The Dumbocrats have had ample time (2 years) to gather evidence. Certainly, you've spent your afternoon here spewing evidence upon evidence fed to you by Dumbocrats. How much more evidence do you need? Where's the vote?

      FLOlson

      Delete
    9. Trump's campaign is raking in the bucks--$13 million in three days and 50,000 new donors.

      Delete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BOOM

    Kurt Volker resigned from his position as the U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine Friday, following reports he collaborated with Ukraine and President Donald Trump.

    He got a subpoena 90 minutes ago.

    There's no way he's going to prison for Trump. While you're reacting to this, another 5 stories will blow up in Trump's face.

    He's lost control. He's rage-tweeting like a hormonal 12 year-old girl. Republicans are hiding from their constituents.

    He's going down, and taking the GOP with him.

    Enjoy the blue wave.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh nooo! Adam Schiff for brains has more evidence! Volker is going to sing!

      There it is again. Trumps lost control! His new talking phrase!

      More subpoenas! Yay!

      Republicans hiding from their constituents!

      Your Dumbocrats have you on the edge of your seat now Adam Schiff for brains. Steady yourself!

      Meanwhile, still no vote for impeachment! Despite all the evidence Adam Schiff for brains dumps. Why no vote? You have it all now! Impeach!

      Enjoy the blue wave? Like the last one you predicted? Heh. Good chance that ain't happening, what with your track record.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. Do you mean Kurt Volker of the McCain Institute? The former aid to John McCain?

      Delete
  17. The way you describe Hillary as a "him" makes me giggle. I keep seeing the anti-impeachment-sized Nadler in a muu-muu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The nadler is hillary's nads.

      Delete
    2. 90s Nadler reminds me of when Cartman gained all that weight.

      Delete
  18. The American Communist won this round.
    Trump and the Ukrainian president spoke with candor about Germany and the EU. They said nothing wrong and their conversation should be classified.
    Although the American Communist would prefer impeachment they'll settle for hindering Trump's ability to speak openly and honestly with world leaders.
    This is kind of like the way they pass an incredibly huge budget and then complain about the deficit or deny funding for the wall and an increase in funds for detention facilities and then scream bloody murder and lie over the way the illegal immigrants are treated.
    Just watch, soon the MSM and communist will be claiming its outrageous that we have a President that world leader won't speak openly with.
    By forcing the President to release the transcript, the American communist hurt America. It's easy for them to hinder Trump if there's no consequence after being found wrong.
    Trump wants world peace, American communist want global communism.
    Take Nony for instance. Nony doesn't care about lower taxes, higher wages, less unemployment, energy independence, Mullahs re-thinking their position, EU being told to pay their share, fair trade, etc... Nony wants full-on global communism and to do that, America has to be destroyed.

    Chollaman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Communism = Fascism = Dictatorship = Thug Rule = Sharia Rule = Animal Farm!!!!

      It's all about being the bully.

      The cabal of bullies.

      One ring to bind all.

      America cannot fall, because America is all Americans and Americans don't play that shit.

      Delete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trumps DNI already confirmed everything and said it's credible.

      Nice try!

      Or is he a Democrat now?

      Hahahahaha!

      Delete
    2. Hey, Schiff for brains, you do realize you are replying to a removed comment? Or are you so spittle-raged from the excitement of your new "evidence" that you can't see straight? Anyhow, way to provide another hit to your rent master's blog!

      FLOlson

      Delete
    3. anon (the lefty turd one) you seem to not grasp the difference between a credibly brought forward whistleblower complaint (as in, they followed the procedure for whistle blowing complaints) and the credibility of the complaint itself as it was deemed not credible enough (because it was third hand information) to even bother reporting it to congress.

      anyone can file a whistle blower complaint, tha doesnt necessarily mean the content of the complaint is credible.

      Delete
  20. As of early this year, one could not make a complaint based on hearsay. It was just noticed that the form had changed sometime between May and August of 2019, probably in August, though.

    What else was going on last month? Dem Schiff yapping about Trump withholding $$ to Ukraine. The complaint was filed last month and Schiff said he wanted the complaint even though he already had it.

    Note, the form indicated is was last modified in August.

    Coincidence? Nahhhhh, the ICIG was involved with the set up of Trump's campaign.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/27/breaking-icig-whistleblower-form-recently-modified-to-permit-complaint-heard-from-others/#more-172125

    "Sean Davis – Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

    The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aww Texas, you're spoiling Adam Schiff for brain's "evidence".

      You know he hasn't read that on those leftist blogs he peruses for trash he can dump here.

      That's okay. He's entertaining. Hope the excitement of all that additional evidence doesn't give him a heart attack.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. Trump already shot down your "hearsay" excuse when he publicly complained the report was so accurate it must have been written by a spy.

      Bummer.

      This is moving too fast for you, isn't it?

      Delete
    3. The "hearsay" excuse is shot down. So Adam Schiff for brains, there's been an impeachment vote in the House, right?

      No? Well, yeah, that's a bummer! For you!

      Moving too fast for me? Hey Schiff for brains, you're the one who replied to a removed comment! LOL!

      FLOlson

      Delete
    4. Now that's an hilarious troll post right there.

      So twisted that even this troll does not realize what it just said and admitted to.

      Troll Confessions!!!



      Delete
  21. From the Sundance link to the Federalist research...

    "The [Intelligence Community Inspector General] cannot transmit information via the ICPWA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing,” the previous form stated under the bolded heading “FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED.” “This includes information received from another person, such as when an employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing.”

    ReplyDelete
  22. Don't know where this came from originally:
    Bear Trap in the Outhouse
    Al: Who would put a bear-trap in an outhouse?
    Ephraim: They wouldn't. That ain't no bear-trap, that's a human-trap.
    Al: Well, why would you want to trap a human?
    Ephraim: I don't know, ask the bears, them was the ones who put it in there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like a form of copper humor.

      Can't be Russian, as Russians would KNOW why the bears did that.

      Delete
  23. Trump's current acting DNI occurred on August 8.

    The CIA operative "whistleblower" letter to Democrats Adam Schiff and Richard Burr was dated August 12.

    The complaint form was modified afterwards.

    On August 28th, Schiff starts his yapping about Trump withholding $$.

    The August revision of the complaint form only notes the month of the change, not the date.

    The only recent date change notification is September 25.

    Trump's DNI, acting, more than likely had no clue.

    Dems are smart, but not really.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/ClimateAudit/status/1177580473566093312

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The form's date could have been made prior, but it was August no matter what.

      Delete
  24. On August 8, CIA official Sue Gordon resigned from the Trump admin as Deputy DNI due to being passed up on the DNI spot.

    Is this the "whistleblower"?

    Is it really is as mundane as this?

    WTF?

    ReplyDelete
  25. From Wikipedia on Sue Gordon ...

    "Two sources told CNN there was an active search underway and that Gordon was not considered likely to be retained because she "is viewed by some in the administration as someone who is not going to be the type of political loyalist Trump wants in that role."[12] Some Trump allies advised him Gordon was too close to former CIA director John Brennan ..."

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_M._Gordon

    ReplyDelete
  26. On August 8th, Trump announced that Maquire was the acting DNI and Sue Gordon resigned. She officially left on August 15th.

    Timeline fits, motive is there. Hmmmm.

    ReplyDelete
  27. From Wikipedia...

    "One Democratic congressional official told NBC News, "if he appoints anyone other than Sue Gordon as acting DNI, the Senate will raise holy hell."

    ReplyDelete
  28. Her resignation letter noted Trump should have his team.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/sue-gordon-resigns-letter-deputy-dni-godspeed-trump-2019-8

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yeah, this is legit.

    (Rolling my eyes)

    Whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  30. So, here are. No matter if it was Gordon or some other Brennanite CIA official, the fact of the matter is that is a political hit job that can be lumped in the coup no matter if is just for revenge or something larger.

    I am truly tired of this.

    Spoils system for all Executive agencies!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree Texas. This is so petty, so ridiculous. On the one hand, this has been a do nothing, Dumbocrat controlled House. So, few, to no new laws, regulations, etc. On the other hand, how has this House improved anything for the People? Oh yeah, this blog's troll Adam Schiff for brains is happy now that he has been presented impeachment "evidence" that he can come spew here, but other than that, nothing. If America reelects this House, then America deserves what it gets.

      Meanwhile, the elites in Washington mean to rule us. Good and hard.

      FLOlson

      Delete
    2. The electrate has, for many generations now, accepted the concept of being "governed by" the governments the electorate believes they elected.

      Being "governed by" is no different than being "ruled by".

      Being "governed for" is closer to what generations of the electorate consider to be the Constitutional purpose of having government at all.

      Politicians are of one nature and one desire: To govern over, to rule over, to dominate over the electorate. Period.

      The past century of our nation's generations of electorate has provided greater and greater means for all of the nation's electorate to communicate with each other.

      During this increasing of means of communications, the politicians have always done everything they possibly can to control said means of the electorate communicating.

      What we have here is.... NOT failure to communcate!!

      What we have here is.... Failure of politicians to control our communicatings!!!

      Now is the epic Hardy Har Har Har momentnfor our nation's electorate.

      Amongst all the politicians' babblings, blatherings, mumblings and bumblings so commonly known, the politicians have thrown the baby out with the bathwater!!

      MAGA has shown that tbst baby ain't no baby no more!!!

      That baby's got teeth!!!

      Thst baby's got spunk!!!

      That baby's got a mighty schlong!!!

      And a sack pair of Sheffield Steel balls!!!

      And that is PISSED OFF, Bigly!!!!

      Are we, Americans All, ready to MAGA Ruuuuuuuumble!!!!!?

      Delete
  31. This just in, President Trump removed the tags on his pillows AND his mattress when he moved into the White House.

    He then threw the tags AWAY!

    When asked, Joe Biden said it was a big f*ing deal!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh! The humanity! Impeach that Orange Man Bad!

      FLOlson

      Delete
  32. The DOJ notes that the complaint did not involve with anyone or anything in or related to our intelligence and intelligence community. Moreover, they noted this was confidential diplomatic communication with the President and a foreign leader. More importantly, the DOJ found no evidence that Trump tried to enrich himself or his interests as the complaint alleges.


    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6429710-OLC-Opinion-Trump-Ukraine-Call.html

    A CIA official makes a hearsay complaint that is only allowed recently and the complaint itself is not just deficient on the merits, but fabrications out of thin air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And we are supposed to believe that not only this is credible, but a valid reason to impeach.

      OMG!

      This was a set up. Just like the collusion and obstruction crud.

      Matter of fact, with this specific instance, this can be seen as Congress trying to oust the President.

      Delete
    2. I agree Texas. But I will say this. Be aware Pelosi, on changing the rules for impeachment to not include the minority. Like what happened in the Senate with Harry Reid and the nuclear option, it will come back to bite the Dumbocrats when they don't control the House, just as it did in the Senate with judicial appointments. Hubris is a powerful drug that makes one act in ways that will not end well.

      FLOlson

      Delete
  33. Odd that this came out during the U.N. meet-up of world leaders. It probably kept the leaders in c.y.a. mode instead of negotiating mode while talking with our President.
    Chollaman

    ReplyDelete
  34. Okay.

    Now all your lazy regulars have gone and done it.

    You let an anonymous put Don over the top n this one.

    A C-Note comment article!!!

    Is it a first, Donny?

    ReplyDelete
  35. And, to put a cherry on top of dat, I am fcking plastered!!!

    Drunk as a skunk ane twice as stinky!!!!

    For shame, you regulsrs, for Shaaaaaaame!!!!

    Erp!!!!

    ReplyDelete