All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Saturday, September 14, 2019

Why not call Democrats communists?

Because they are communists.

Thursday night's presidential debate on ABC made that clear.

Democrats made it clear that they are for gun confiscation, wealth redistribution (reparations), a government-run medical system (Medicare For All), and an end to citizenship through open borders with special privileges for non-citizens, especially the ones here illegally.

Beto O'Rourke said, "Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow them to be used against fellow Americans anymore."

No one challenged him.

No one said look, you little twerp son-in-law of a billionaire, you cannot do that because it is unconstitutional.

The other 9 presidential candidates on that stage did not call him out because he said publicly what they all believe. That is the plan, or at least part of it. Eventually they will get there. They banned assault weapons once before.

Cheryl K. Chumley of the Washington Times wrote, "Thanks, Beto."

Her argument (and I agree) is that O'Rourke made it impossible for Democrats to deny they want your guns and they want them now. She wrote, "There’s the golden ticket the NRA, the Republican Party, the patriotic Second Amendment supporters of this country needed to prove their argument, to prove their points, to showcase the truths about the Democrats’ ultimate gun controlling end game."

Daniel J. Flynn of American Spectator wrote, "That ideological vision includes a doubly unconstitutional confiscation of weapons through executive fiat endorsed by Sen. Kamala Harris and O’Rourke ('Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47'), abolition of private health insurance in a bill sponsored by Sens. Sanders and Warren, former Vice President Joe Biden’s insistence that 'nobody should be in jail for a nonviolent crime,' reparations for slavery supported by O’Rourke, a wealth tax proposed by Warren, Sen. Cory Booker’s call to 'create an office in the White House to deal with the problem of white supremacy and hate crimes,' Harris demanding that government 'de-incarcerate women and children' (even ones who murder?), Andrew Yang wanting to 'give every American 100 democracy dollars that you only give to candidates and causes you like,' and the entire stage endorsing open borders, if in muted terms during this debate, and amnesty for illegal immigrants."

That is a long sentence but it is a good summary of the Left of Lenin state of Democrats. Incremental socialism be damned. They want communism and they want it now.



So why not call them communists? Because that is exactly who they are.

Calling someone a communist -- even Chairman Xi -- gets you branded a McCarthyite. But the people branding you are communists and their useful idiots, so we should not care what they say about us.

Hats off to New Faces GOP for calling the Democrat Communists out.
KTRH in Houston reported, "The 30-second spot from the Republican-affiliated PAC, New Faces GOP, features founder Elizabeth Heng, a former GOP congressional candidate in California, warning about liberal politicians who embrace socialism.

"Heng says in the ad, 'this is the face of socialism and ignorance,' as AOC’s photo catches fire and burns to show images from the Cambodian Civil War in the 1970s from which her father fled.

"Heng adds, 'Does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez know the horrors of socialism? My father was minutes from death in Cambodia before a forced marriage saved his life. That’s socialism: Forced obedience. Starvation. Mine is a face of freedom. My skin is not white. I’m not outrageous, racist, nor socialist. I’m a Republican."

AOC is the soul of the Democrat Party, as I have written many times.

She is a spoiled brat who got a nothing degree from Boston University and could only get a job in a bar. Magically she got donors and transformed herself into Evita last year and knocked off the leader of moderate Democrats (they still exist) in the House.

AOC cried racist in a tweet, even though Heng is a woman of color.

The press is reporting the story as if people want to set AOC on fire. Roll Call's headline was, "GOP group defends ad showing burning image of AOC during Democratic debate."

But no conservative should care what the press says about us. Let us call the communists "communist" because that is what they are.

30 comments:

  1. Calling them Communists is being polite compared to what they really are, children of the devil.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We are historically stuck with the word/term "communist", even though communist = fascist = dictatorship = the conqueror worms.

    A dictatorship by any other name would stink no less.

    All forms of systems which control by use of force, ultimately deadly force, are dictatorships.

    The democrats are at core dictatorship addicted.

    When, that is, they are the dictators.

    As for socialisms, variety being plural, well, these are inherently imbalanced between those who produce & consume, and those who only consume & reproduce themselves.

    A society can tolerate only a certain percentage of it's population being consumers only.

    An economy tolerates that certain maximum percentage, since an economy functions on the constant producing and consuming.

    We produce and are paid, then pay for what we consume.

    Those to whom a portion of what we are paid is taken via taxation, then "given" to those who only consume are, thus, financing those who only consume, who then pay what they have not earned for what they consume.

    The maximum tolerable percentage of consumers only described above is different for each system effected.

    For society, it is much lower a maximum than for economy.

    However, even economy has a maximum of tolerance far lower than socialism.

    Thus, socialism is tolerated until the citizens stop tolerating it. Either for the consumer only maximum percentage exceeding society's maximum or exceeding economy's maximum.

    Socialism seems to admit to no maximum.

    The rest of the -isms make accepting tolerant percentages of non producing consumers seem benign.

    Charity, which is effectively, tho involuntarily, what "socialism" does, is not toxic to either society or economy, as long as it does not exceed tolerable percentages of both society and economy.

    We, as business, accept payment in cash, check, charge/credit and dole funds.

    It is, after all, business.

    If business truly wanted to stop "socialism", business would not accept payments for goods and services from dole funds.



    ReplyDelete
  3. Never worry about being compared to Joe McCarthy. Joe was right even if his methods weren't always groovy.

    The Left has set up more blacklists in the past 50 years and ruined more people than the mainstream ever did in the 40s and 50s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Communism is a foolish, flawed, simplistic intellectual zero-sum game that fails miserably in the face of human psychology and variability (reality). But weak minds (AOC, the Pope, the average college political science teacher) can take to it easily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bingo Dermot. Never forget that Marx and Engels were library whores who never worked a day of real labor in their lives.

      Delete
  5. If Dems are communists why did they forget to install a dictatorship with Omama? Guess they forgot!

    Why not call conservatives fascists? Because they are. They ban drugs that kill about 50K a year but not tobacco whic kills ten times more.

    Or alcohol which kills 100K a year. Oh no we love our alcohol too much announce the moral crusaders. Fascists love to regulate personal behavior that offends their weak conscience.

    Trump the tyrant is about to ban vaping since 6 have died. Six. But oh no not tobacco! We love those excise taxes too much to stop

    Why not ban guns which kill far more? Oh no we love our guns that's why.

    Next the tyrant Trump demands zero interest rates. He commands the FED, another fascist agency, to begin right away.

    So pick your poison folks. Both parties are corrupt will remain so until DC is bankrupted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Q: "If Dems are communists why did they forget to install a dictatorship with Omama?"

      A: Because they don't have the balls. The sack. The guts. The nerve. The moxy. The balls.


      Q: "Why not call conservatives fascists?"

      A: The no balls democrats do call conservatives "fascists". No sane person does that, because conservatives are not fascists. And no sane person is not also an honest person.

      Q: "Why not ban guns which kill far more?"

      A: Because that is a false comparison. As well as a false claim of banning.


      Given your addiction to posting stupidities, that is all.

      Delete
    2. The truth is we are actually post republic. We lament that but it is true. Founders created the constitution and bill of rights for a moral society. Communists knew this and sought from the 30's to take down our moral fabric. It worked with the Islamic influx and the third world invasion, porn, abortion, easy divorce and promotion of drugs and welfare. So now it is a choice of dictatorial communism or nationalist fascism. The left has been laboring for the support of communism since the thirties and backed stalin and his murderous conquests instead of nationalist hitler and his murderous conquests to establish the Bavarian empire and control europe. Hitler wanted to control Europe under nationalism and stalin wanted to control the WORLD for communism the left and the bush cartel chose communism and clinton let them in the two to establish communism worldwide. Kissinger said the china model was the model they were building for world economies. Along comes the nationalist trump and ALL the factions come out against him. Because they have all been laboring for communism. As far as world war 2 goes, we should have let Hitler take europe. He offered the Jews to us and we said no. He probably would have expelled them and stayed in europe. But NO. We bailed out England and France and he went postal. Why.. because the bbn plan was to implement the stalin and lenin model of communism, not nationalism. Remember, stalin starved with melanin 7 million Ukrainians and nobody talks about that in the media, only hitler and the Jews. Why.. because the media wants nationalism to be bad and ignore communism. Remember, hitler was at war with stalin. We chose the murderous stalin and then sold out china through harry dexter white, phillip jessop and Frank Stewart service. With our treasury and state depts. Hitler was terrible, stalin was worse. Our Gov't chose stalin and now fight. America is beyond a republic. We now choose communism or fascism. Forget the dictator mantle of the propaganda. The difference between the two is the economic factor and the means of production. State owned with no private property or private ownership with Gov't regulation. A time for choosing and don't be deceived.

      Delete
    3. Obama is a Marxist, and he did give his cronies billions of our tax and DOJ settlement dollars. He also corrupted government agencies like the FBI, CIA, DOJ and IRS. Obama was a good little commie.

      Delete
    4. You all tried with the massive corruption and fraud but were defeated in your efforts to elect HiLlARy. That is why the country has been in an uproar for the last three years with false flag operations like the Russian Collusion delusion. Back in 2016 many of Donald Trump's rally's were attended by groups of terrorists who waited outside and assaulted attendees as they departed.

      Don, we could ban brains because of strokes.... Nonny would not be affected.

      Delete
    5. 1. Paragraph breaks are allowed in comments.

      2. Your comment pleads for Paragraph Breaks.

      3. I give your comment Paragraph breaks + point out your fallacies and duplicities.

      4. You may thank me later.




      "The truth is we are actually post republic." (In your wet dreams.)

      "We lament that but it is true." (Nope.)

      "Founders created the constitution and bill of rights for a moral society." (Did you forget to include 'Our' preceding "Founders"? And did you forget to capitalize 'Constitution' and 'Bill of Rights'?)

      "Communists knew this and sought from the 30's to take down our moral fabric. It worked with the Islamic influx and the third world invasion, porn, abortion, easy divorce and promotion of drugs and welfare." (Quite the fruit cake mixing of nuts there. Intended to duplicitous purpose?)

      "So now it is a choice of dictatorial communism or nationalist fascism." (And there it is, your intent to deceive! The either/or gambit. The lie. Dictatorial applies to Both communism AND Fascism, and not at all to Nationalism, yet you lie by applying it to nationalism. Bad doggy!!!)

      "The left has been laboring for the support of communism since the thirties and backed stalin and his murderous conquests instead of nationalist hitler and his murderous conquests to establish the Bavarian empire and control europe. (You then continue merrily along, duplicitously omitting that hilter USED nationalistic panderings to manipulate his Fascist Dictatorship cravings. Cute. Duplicitous. Typical of communists.)

      "Hitler wanted to control Europe under nationalism and stalin wanted to control the WORLD for communism the left and the bush cartel chose communism and clinton let them in the two to establish communism worldwide." (More bullshit deceptions. You are smoking, comrade!!!)

      "Kissinger said the china model was the model they were building for world economies." (The set up bait, wiggly worm on hook. Chicom got their template.)

      "Along comes the nationalist trump and ALL the factions come out against him." (Boy, buddy, at this point you must have popped yourself a boner, anticipating that your duplicitous composition has hooked someone!!! Again, Nationalism is not fascism.)

      "Because they have all been laboring for communism." (You are laboring for communism. By posting your deliberately devoid of paragraph breaks mush on blogs. Labor on, comrade!!!)

      "As far as world war 2 goes, we should have let Hitler take europe. He offered the Jews to us and we said no. He probably would have expelled them and stayed in europe. But NO. We bailed out England and France and he went postal. Why.. because the bbn plan was to implement the stalin and lenin model of communism, not nationalism. Remember, stalin starved with melanin 7 million Ukrainians and nobody talks about that in the media, only hitler and the Jews. Why.. because the media wants nationalism to be bad and ignore communism. Remember, hitler was at war with stalin. We chose the murderous stalin and then sold out china through harry dexter white, phillip jessop and Frank Stewart service. With our treasury and state depts. Hitler was terrible, stalin was worse. Our Gov't chose stalin and now fight." (Did you prematurely pop a load while assembling this flowing diarhea stream? You should have, it fits your mental erogenous profile.)

      "America is beyond a republic. We now choose communism or fascism. Forget the dictator mantle of the propaganda. The difference between the two is the economic factor and the means of production. State owned with no private property or private ownership with Gov't regulation. A time for choosing and don't be deceived." (Annnnnnnd, the finish!!! The either/or bullshit wrap up to a comment of volcanic diarhea quality!!! Comrade!!! You did it!!! You exposed yourself on a blog!!!)


      You may thank me now.

      Delete
    6. Typical Alsinki response. There is no defense so make a strawman argument that is a bad joke. Tobacco kills really so does sugar? Regulate personal behavior, well duh every society does that skippy. Take a look at every religion.

      But when your a paid Soros employee you have to fling the monkey poo to fool the idiots.

      Commies can't defend their agenda that's why they call themselves progressives, liverals etc. Its why they won't say they'' ban firearms, they'll use "commonsense" rules for "the children." What tripe.

      100 million dead is the butcher bills of communism. It began with the but jobs of the French Revolution and got worse.

      Delete
  6. What I found interesting were the shrieks of joy from the rabble as the smirking Beto made his declaration. In Texas, no less.
    Two years ago we visited Houston as well as a venue 20 miles away. Parts of the city where we stayed reminded me of LA, where I lived for 15 years in the 60s. Loose and hippie rotting.
    The outer venue was more like the Texas I knew from hunting trips decades ago. AR 15s, strong and old family ties, boots.
    I hope Trump puts extra time there and doesn't take its vote for granted.

    ReplyDelete
  7. “This is your time.

    Their time is done. It’s over.”

    ReplyDelete
  8. Incremental socialism be damned

    Hardly! Conservatives adore it. They adore letting government educate and babysit their kids. They demand it!

    They love FDR's socialism too with retirement security and health security. They don't want these programs to end. Not on our watch!

    In other words, they are phony conservatives they are neocons who love trillion dollar deficits and trillion dollar pentagon budgets dropping 40K bombs a year on poverty stricken nations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Heh.

      Muslim knucklehead?

      Chicom knucklehead?

      Berniebro chucklehead?

      A clintonista jilted schmucklehead?

      A mittens mutt fucklehead?

      Not a russki muttonhead???

      Perhaps merely a dumbass.

      It's a mystery, cloaked within a quagmire of absurdity, coated with a thin veneer of stupidity, and tied with a bow made of mockery.

      The internet.

      Something for everything!!!

      Delete
  9. Isn't it sad. Muslims kill other Muslims (When they aren't killing Americans) because they are not the 'right' sect. People of Color (POC) call other POC's racist because their skin isn't exactly the right shade of color.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Unk: Nice points. It would seem that having legitimate voting decisions is not enough. We also need people to accept them. And we had that for awhile. Now the Dems are denying such.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The dems do not accept the decisions because in elections past the won with fraud. they cannot fathom that their fraud this time around was not enough to carry HiLlARy to the throne.
      California has a new system where fraud is impossible to prove. Anybody can bring in a bag of ballots and claim to have collected them from any neighborhood. How can we be certain that those ballots were completed by the named person? Mail in ballots I am mostly okay with since the post office workers are mostly disinterested in promoting fraud. There are recorded cases where the ballot gatherers were illegal immigrants. Orange county flipped? Look at the numbers and tell me that was not fraud. Do it with a straight face and you are a sociopath... Or a bigger fool than Nonny.

      Delete
    2. Uhhhh, dermot, are you related to kermit?

      "Unk: nice points."???

      You do understand, dermot, that you can post your approval of this "Unk" reply comment under the comment this "Unk" replied to, do you not?

      And that is where you would have posted it, IF your intent was to express your approval of this "Unk" punk's reply comment.

      Instead, you led off your opinion on this "Unk" punk's reply comment with your expression of adimiration and followed with your mushy version of attempting to establish commonality with those here who comment.

      Feeble, comrade, feeble.

      Just post your agreements where they belong, under the comment or reply to comment which you approve of.

      Be brave, comrade!!!

      Be bold, comrade!!!

      Be under your fellow comrade's comment!!!

      Delete
    3. Uhhhhnonymous: These pretzels are making me thirsty.

      Delete
  11. After gutting the 2nd Amendment, I wonder what other rights the DemocRATs would like to unwind?

    The Dems worked from 1865 to 1920 trying to re-enslave the blacks. Hence the whole reason for the NRA.

    The mind boggles.

    - Toby Flenderson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Checks time line. Nope... 1865 to 1965. They let up with the many civil rights laws realizing that having a constant base voting democrat was more beneficial than having them do what machinery and innovation was now capable of. As technology allows voter fraud to replace actual voters, the blacks have slipped in importance in the dem hierarchy.

      Delete
    2. Really? Thats why the Dems have 95% of them voting Dem. If they lose the blacks and jews they have no base. As it is the Dems are a confederation of freaks, kooks, rejects, a side show acts that have no influence. Look at Beto, Warren, Sanders, Biden, any of them should be inside of an looney bin. None of them have ever achieved anything of note except been a politician-which is like aspiring to be a cockroach.

      Delete
  12. I've called the DemCong for several years now.

    ReplyDelete
  13. >AOC cried racist in a tweet, even though Heng is a woman of color.

    They don't care if you're a poc, they call African Americans white supremacists. It's all about ideology, everyone they don't agree with is a rayssit or a Nazi. I really hope the American public sees through their bullcrap !

    ReplyDelete
  14. The communist label was devised to give cover to the more pernicious socialist. It played well and allowed the socialists in Great Britain and from the New Deal to continue their march under the air cover of not-communist. When in reality they were just working to impose socialism by themselves or their friends.


    Lenin and Stalin did start to use "communist" to differentiate their Leftist socialism from the Rightist socialism, such as fascism.

    But Stalin was waiting for communism that would come after the "socialist methods of production" kicked in.

    "What Stalin calls socialism corresponds by and large to Marx’s concept of the “early phase” of communism. Stalin reserves the term communism exclusively for what Marx called the “higher phase” of communism. Socialism, in the sense in which Stalin has lately used the term, is moving towards communism, but is in itself not yet communism. Socialism will turn into communism as soon as the increase in wealth to be expected from the operation of the socialist methods of production has raised the lower standard of living of the Russian masses to the higher standard which the distinguished holders of important offices enjoy in present-day Russia."
    --von Mises, Ludwig (1947). Planned Chaos

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have been calling them communists for years now.

    ReplyDelete