All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Saturday, June 22, 2019

Why no one believes Trump's accuser



She is lying.

She was not raped. She was not attacked. She was not accosted.

We know this because she has been silent for 23 years about it -- including four years ago when she could have made this claim and stopped his election.

That she did not claim it four years ago is proof enough that this is political sabotage. Four years ago, in the summer of 2015, this woman and her ilk thought the nomination of Donald John Trump would seal the deal for a Hillary presidency.

Now she is desperate to stop his re-election.

It will not work because Lefty Liars tried this on Clarence Thomas. Anita Hill committed perjury to try to stop him because he is a black man and black men are not allowed to be conservative in America.

They tried this with Brett Kavanaugh, and failed because we saw what they tried to do with Justice Thomas.

Her lies also fail because the media has trotted out lie after lie after lie about President Trump.

He did not collude with Russia.

He did not hire hookers to pee in Obama's bed.

He did not throw Martin Luther King's bust out of the Oval Office.

And those were just some of the lies the media told on his first day in office.

The public has False Accusations Fatigue. The media has cried rape once too often. There is also the Jussie Smollett Factor.

Her piece in New York magazine is weird. She says she kept getting attacked by men beginning as a child.

No one believes her, including the people pushing her story.

UPDATE:

Tweets from the accuser:

37 comments:

  1. Why is this still considered an avenue to thwart Trump?

    Trump broke the cycle and demonstrated you can fight back against breathless accusations that cannot be proven it occured.

    The Kavanaugh hearings demonstrated the truth to the broken cycle.

    I seriously doubt you cannot get a preponderance of evidence in a civil action and know for sure there is no beyond a reasonable doubt in a crminal action, criminal statute of limitations not withstanding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .... doubt you can get ... oops

      Delete
    2. Because they're a one trick pony. Because they're stupid. Because their voters are stupid.
      If they were smart, they wouldn't be voting democrat anymore

      Delete
  2. I wouldn’t touch her with a ten foot pole. And neither would Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did he/she transition before or after the alleged encounter?

      Delete
    2. I wouldn’t touch her with your pole.

      Delete
    3. Here is a picture of the woman the new york times said Trump mistreated back in the 80's and she fired back saying he was a perfect gentleman. why would he waste his time with that other thing? He has never had to force himself on anyone.

      http://www.mancrushes.com/sites/default/files/Rowanne-Brewer-hot-11.jpg

      CKL

      Delete
  3. geez. another leap forward in communications. an electronic form of a paper magazine, and yet you can still smell the rancid hate oozing from every festering pore. amazing.

    and once again, mom was right.

    if you keep making that face, it's going to get stuck.

    waterman

    ReplyDelete
  4. IF any woman was attacked, would she REALLY keep for 23 years the clothing she was wearing at the time? I don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There’s only one man in America who would be willing to take on such a, um, distasteful assignment: Vilehelm Jaifferson Clintoine.

      Delete
    2. Lindu, not unless there is a "stain" to preserve.

      Kate

      Delete
  5. Its like the carpet bombing campaign we tried in Vietnam during Line backer II. We dropped a ton of ordinance into basically empty jungles but it felt productive and who knows maybe we might get lucky? That is what the democrats/media are reduced to. It worked or used to work 30 years ago, why not throw more garbage against the wall and see what sticks?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice analogy. Spot on observation.

      Delete
  6. What bugs me is she can fit into some clothes she owned 20 years later.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Democrats become emaciated as they age.

      Delete
  7. Why are Democrats obsessed with making sexual assault allegations great again?!

    ReplyDelete
  8. An accusation of sexual assault has been made against a Republican. If you watched the Kavanaugh hearings you know what is coming.

    1. Democrats and RINOs will declare that they believe the accuser because she is obviously telling the truth.

    2. Because of the passage of time and the vagueness of the accusations there will never be conclusive evidence of guilt or innocence.

    3. Democrats and RINOs will assert that Trump must be presumed guilty until proven innocent.

    4. Democrats and RINOs will demand congressional hearings.

    5. Democrats will turn any hearings into a circus.

    6. The media will presume that Trump is guilty and act as Democrat advocates.

    7. The media will harass Trump, his family, and members of his administration with loaded/slanted questions.

    8. Congressional Republicans demonstrate a complete lack of backbone.

    This story is total donkey crap, just like the story of the crazy bitch who accused Kavanaugh. She has already said she doesn’t want to pursue formal charges because it would be disrespectful of all the women being raped at the border. No formal charges means no opportunity for Trump to defend himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 8a. Mitt Romney will hold a press conference demanding that President Trump resign immediately.

      Delete
  9. She is pushing a book of her sexual adventures...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Are they really rolling out this nonsense again? The only ones who might believe it would not have voted for Trump anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Would be nice to see President Trump's attorneys take her boney ass into court, take her for all she's got.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I will withhold my verdict until I see what she looked like in 1996. A rabid raccoon wouldn't attack her in present form.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Trump was cheating on Marla Maples at the time, with women far, far, far more appealing than this horse-faced woman so I do not believe her story for a minute.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I believe her when she says she hasn't changed clothes in 23 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It looks like she hasn't taken a bath since then, as well.

      Delete
  15. The New York Times Magazine sent out, before the election, groups of reporters to interview hundreds of young women who knew Trump over the years. They were fishing for some juicy bits of scandal. Not one woman claimed sexual harassment, to say nothing of rape. How did NYT miss this "prominent" one?

    Trump was a young, rich, good-looking, and charming man at that time. He would have had his choice of willing women to be intimate with. Why would he even think of raping someone?

    Her story is so improbable, so old.

    ReplyDelete
  16. At the very end of the article she claims she has not had sex since the alleged assault. Talk about burying the lede!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hadn't had sex, with a human, prior to it either.

      Delete
  17. Are we meant to believe someone as famous as Trump went to a department store, assaulted this woman, and no one saw or heard anything? Really? They think we’re all stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Not a sound? A scream or a loud GET OF ME from a changing room in a department store? She needs therapy.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This doesn't look good for Bergdorf-Goodman. They should be sued for enabling such things to go on, if indeed this happened. What are Bergdorf's changing rooms like? No staff monitoring who enters and with how many items? Are they single-person rooms with floor-to-transom doors, or cubicles with doors that leave legs and feet visible, or with curtains that don't lock? No other customers were around? No security cameras monitoring the floor for shoplifters?

    ReplyDelete
  20. >>> Carroll Blasey II gives women a bad name. <<<

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yes of course a 49 year old billionaire in financial trouble is out chasing after a 52 year old bimbo, when he has a Hot 31 year old wife. A non-smoking, alcohol-free, germaphobe, would never expose himself to the opportunity for more financial blackmail. A billionaire gallivanting around an exclusive woman’s clothing department would certainly attract the gossip columns. Show me the archives, they’re digging but come up empty.

    ReplyDelete
  22. That's what she was wearing? Trump probably saw her then started looking around for the tripod holding the bucket so he could make a donation.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Rut Roh!!!!

    Mittens sat on his brain buns and, now, has spouted his magical opinion!!!!

    Don, ya gotta do Mittens!!!!

    Maybe a thorough review of the Mitten's magic would be adequately amusing.

    After all, Mittens is carrying the weight on this most recent nonsense from the demented slut brigade.

    C'mon, Don!!!!

    Give us a Mitten's magical mocking tour!!!!

    ReplyDelete