All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Comey's book could convict him

If Jimmy the Weasel Comey ever stands trial for his unconstitutional spying on a presidential candidate or his interference in the 2016 election, a key witness for prosecutors may be his own book.


Published a little more than a year ago, the book reveals an FBI director who hated his boss.

Comey wrote, "I once again was having flashbacks to my earlier career as a prosecutor against the Mob. The silent circle of assent. The boss in complete control. The loyalty oaths. The us-versus-them worldview. The lying about all things, large and small, in service of some code of loyalty that put the organization above morality and above the truth."

This establishes motive.

But Comey's book made plain his loyalty was to Chairman Barack. Donald John Trump beat Hillary, Comey was devastated. He wrote of an exchange with Obama.

Obama said, “I picked you to be FBI director because of your integrity and your ability. I want you to know that nothing — nothing — has happened in the last year to change my view.”

Comey (on the verge of tears -- that's what he wrote) said, “Boy, were those words I needed to hear. . . . I’m just trying to do the right thing.”

Obama said, “I know. I know.”

That Star Warsian exchange and other writings about allowing Hillary to walk instead of prosecuting her for mishandling classified material could pose a different problem because Spygate was not his only act of criminality.

Rod Rosenstein recently said, "The clearest mistake was the director’s decision to hold a press conference about an open case, reveal his recommendation and discuss details about the investigation, without the consent of the prosecutors and the attorney general.

"Then, he chose to send a letter to the Congress on the eve of the election stating that one of the candidates was under criminal investigation, expecting it to be released immediately to the public."

Comey re-opened and closed the case late in the election campaign. In his book, he said it was because he knew she was going to win.

He wrote, “I have read she has felt anger toward me personally, and I'm sorry for that. I'm sorry I couldn't do a better job explaining to her and her supporters why I made the decisions I made.

“It is entirely possible that, because I was making decisions in an environment where Hillary Clinton was sure to be the next president, my concern about making her an illegitimate president by concealing the restarted investigation bore greater weight than it would have if the election appeared closer or if Donald Trump were ahead in the polls.”

His purpose was not justice but exoneration of the candidate he supported.

I trust that prosecutors will consider using his book against him. One problem for liars is keeping their story straight. His book will straighten him out.

By the way, I am convinced he is the Designated Indicted Co-Conspirator. Someone will take one for the team. Why not him?

14 comments:

  1. Rice is like, "Tag, you're it". I think she out maneuvered him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He screwed up in every way imaginable, and then some. This is one person I would like Nonnyass to give us his honest opinion about, but I don't think we'll get it even if he claims to be telling us, since he can't put two words together without trying to score points in his head.

    This book is already showing up in used book stores as the mountains of mass purchased books to get ratings up are sold off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You mean Chairman Hussein. Don't think Comey will go down without squealing to get leniency. Clapper and Brennan must go with him for genuine justice. Those three are already attacking each other its a pleasure to see.

    Then re-open all Clinton's deleted emails. NSA has em all so Trump can get them anytime he wants. NSA can also verify how the DNC dirty laundry go hung out to dry. I bet Seth Rich did it not the Russians.

    Loretta Lynch was so compromised it was almost embarrassing to watch it unfold.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A higher loyalty? Right. Anyone could say that he's just playing for the credulous crowd. The few who still believe everything they read. Face it he's a traitor. Fifty years ago he'd be executed after conviction before a jury of his peers.

    He can write his next book in jail. I might read that one!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why for the love of God is ANYONE still supporting that marrying-up lesbodyke alcoholic corrupt Commie? The People Speaketh Still. Lock that bitch up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hear, hear!

      - Gary B

      Delete
    2. I haven’t forgotten Benghazi, Gare.

      Delete
    3. And a list of her other crimes as long as my arm. It's likely her collection dirt from her Filegate caper has protected her so far. Not only is blackmail one of her tools, it seems murder is, too. I think she is LBJ's equal, when it comes to committing the worst type of crimes, without giving it a second thought. It might safe to say DC has the highest concentration of criminals on the planet.

      - Gary B

      Delete
  6. Selecting some hapless dope to take one for the team is not a satisfactory outcome. The entire team must take one for the country. If not, then justice will not be served and the rule of law will continue to be the cruel joke it's always been. If these treasonous elites skate, I believe there will be consequences - unintended consequences. Only Trump can alienate his base, as we head into 2020. This issue is the mother of all tipping points. The ball is in his court.

    - Gary B

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Presidents objective is for this to not happen again. If Comey takes one for the team and the rest can skate, it will happen again and soon. Brennan and his crew must be taken down and the system they used to do it revised or eliminated. If that doesn't happen there will be a democrat out there that will repeat the process but be a lot more smart about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am going to lay out my prediction here: Brennan, Comey, Clapper and anyone who can be tied with hard evidence to the hoax will be tried, convicted, and jailed...with the exception of Obama and Clinton. Should any hard evidence be found the knew, blessed or directed this shit-show, then they will be pardoned by Trump...damning their legacy forever after.

    Why? President Trump's and his inclination to defend the innocent. While he is willing, and relishes, a good political fight, too many were falsely smeared and unfairly punished. Also, they went after his family. Finally, he has got to clean house before he leaves office, otherwise he is likely to be targeted as a private citizen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you implying that if damning evidence were produced implicating Ozero or HRC Trump would pardon them?

      My initial reaction was knee-jerk “why-in-the-hell-would-he-do-that” but wait - think about that for a moment: is that not the ULTIMATE own? In reality, Trump would own them & the media by doing that.

      That is TRULY having The. Last. Laugh.

      Thoughts?

      Boarwild

      Delete
  9. It's HIS signature on the illegal FISA application, he's dead meat anyway if there are genuine indictments.
    Which I hope for.

    ReplyDelete