Ginsburg is why they fought so hard against Kavanaugh

The Democrat wrath against Judge Brett Kavanaugh made little sense last September because his vote was not considered a swing vote.

Nevertheless, Democrats beclowned themselves with allegations from a perjuring professor and silly nonsense about fart jokes in his high school yearbook. (Qui boofed?)

But Stan Greene at the Santa Monica Observer had an excellent explanation at the time: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Over the summer, she informed Democrat senators that her cancer had returned.

Greene predicted, "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Will Retire from the US Supreme Court in January 2019."

While she likely will survive this month, the truth is she had cancer, which panicked Democrats.

They still worry for good reason.

She is a frail little old lady who has fractured ribs and just underwent lung surgery. She has suffered cancer three times. She is unable to work.

Greene wrote in September, "She has told key Democratic members of the Senate about her medical condition, including ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein. This explains in part the 'take no prisoners' attitude of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh nomination, carefully orchestrating weak 37 year old allegations against Kavanaugh by Women he barely remembers knowing in High School and College.

"Kavanaugh is a player in this drama. He's in the wrong place at the wrong time. President Donald J. Trump will be replacing Notorious RBG, the lovechild of the left, and so will remake the Supreme Court for a generation. The Democrats simply must win back the Senate in November 2018, progressives feel."

Oddly enough, the attacks on Kavanaugh so repulsed people that not only did President Trump keep the Senate, but voters rose and threw out four incumbent Democrat senators.

In a midterm.

Opposition incumbent senators have a 96% chance of re-election in a midterm.

President Trump dumped four -- the most since 1934.

As her health declines and her absences from the court lengthen, some liberals are angry with her.

Stephanie Mencimer of Mother Jones wrote, "no amount of swag or hagiography can obscure the fact that, while Ginsburg is responsible for a great number of landmark legal decisions, her legacy may be sorely tarnished by one truly terrible one: refusing to retire when President Barack Obama could have named her replacement. That decision came into stark relief this month when Ginsburg fell and broke three ribs — and half of the nation took a collective gasp. Women took to Twitter to offer the justice a rib."

The court is all liberals have left, even after regaining the House. Time is not on their side. Her departure leaves an opportunity for Clarence Thomas to retire, assured of a successor who will be as conservative. This will lengthen the conservative era of the high court.

We are told that women somehow are better than men. But the legacy of Ginsburg shows women like men have difficulty surrendering power.