President Trump's withdrawal of our 2,000 troops from Syria and half our troops from Afghanistan has Washington a-twitter.
Jim Mattis was hailed as a hero for standing up to the president. If he had done this in the previous regime he would have been called a racist.
The MacArthuresque exit of General Mattis drew an explanation from James Durso, a military expert on supply chain. He also seems to know politics.
"Mattis did not understand, or did not want to understand, he was a political appointee, and that meant executing the policy of the elected officials. He never discerned that Trump is clearing the decks before the looming contest with China, ridding the U.S. of legacy conflicts like Syria where we won’t win, and Afghanistan where we’ve already lost," Durso wrote in a column in The Hill.
Durso gave many examples of Mattis slow-rolling the president rather than carrying out his orders.
"Mattis spent much of his time telling whoever would listen that he was at the Pentagon to protect it from the Commander-in-Chief, which is pedestrian Washington, D.C. image management, at odds with the selfless, soldier-scholar image he cultivated. Mattis the man is not the Mattis of myth," Durso wrote.
There is a lot of that going around in Washington because the place is a swamp.
But the capital has been a swamp for some time. President Lincoln nearly lost the Civil War because the denizens of Washington had deemed him unfit for office. General McClellan slow-rolled the army Lincoln gave him.
I bought into the Mattis myth. So did The Donald. We are not perfect.
Durso's calling out Mattis for not being a good soldier who carried out his orders was delightful. Durso wrote, "It’s not clear why Mattis volunteered to be Trump’s Secretary of Defense — we’ll have to wait for the book deal and speaking tour to learn that — but he was ill-equipped to serve a President who arrived at the White House uninterested in being beholden to the ways of the national security bureaucracy: 'the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.'"
That's hot.
But it was the last line that was the illumination: "He never discerned that Trump is clearing the decks before the looming contest with China, ridding the U.S. of legacy conflicts like Syria where we won’t win, and Afghanistan where we’ve already lost."
A closed society, Red China is open about one thing. It wants to depose the United States as the top dog in the world.
Red China has given its target date: January 1, 2025.
That just happens to fall 19 days before President Trump completes his second term.
If you think Donald Trump is going to leave that nightmare to his successor, you are a fool.
And if you think the Washington Establishment is not siding with Red China, you are a double fool.
Wow.
ReplyDeleteThe Clintons received beaucoup bucks from the Red Chinese and gave them our missile technology and a U.S. Navy base in California. Google and other "social media" companies are designing ways to help them repress their citizens (to be employed in the U.S. when perfected, no doubt). Diane Feinstein employed a Chinese spy for twenty years and her husband got as rich as Croessus by dealing with the Chinese. And don't even get started on democrats and their footsie-playing games with Russia.
ReplyDeleteYes, our elected representatives have become rather proficient at promoting the welfare of the Communists. Apparently they are receiving more compensation from the Reds than they are receiving from their ostensible employers: We The People. That could explain why they ignore us Deplorables. We're just too chintzy to deserve their attention.
- Elric
Russia may end up our ally in the fight against the P.R.C., just as we partnered with Stalin to bring down Hitler.
Delete-TK
Elric,
DeleteWith much respect, I argue that gulag, er, google is not doing anything different in China than they do in the US, repressing the citizens views
So has Vichy Mitchy McConnell's family.
DeleteNot to forget Clinton's diversion of Loral satellite technology to China almost as soon as he gained the Presidency.
DeleteIlluminating column. I was never all that thrilled about a former general being secretary of defence. Mattis was a great general by all accounts, but that position isn't about fighting wars.
ReplyDeleteIt's about understanding who you are and what the Constitution is.
DeleteGeorge Marshall was a good SecDef and a better SecState.
Marshall was a platoon leader during the Spanish American war. He was a staff officer during WWI. He was a brigade commander between wars but was principally a staff officer because he was good at it. He never commanded a major unit in combat. Never had a Division or higher command. Mattis was more of a Patton type of General. He commanded at all levels in combat. I served with him and liked him. It's obvious though, that he was not the man the President needed for the transformation ahead.
DeleteI read an article that stated Mattis really quit because of an argument he had with the President over the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. The President picked the replacement and Mattis went off on a tirade that it was his choice to make. That's when he was told, "you're fired!".....
Well, ditto to what you've stated before, Mr Surber. I voted for Donald John Trump to be CinC & I expect him to fully embrace that role and he does!
ReplyDeleteWhen Trump went on Alex Jones show in January 2016, one of the comments he made was: "I am going to be the most pro-military president in history!" I'll never forget that interview.
DeleteI still remember waiting in the middle of the night in a locked glass "Telephone Booth" while my security clearance was checked so I could service Computer Peripherals for the company which supplied the satellite technology to China after China BOUGHT Bill Clinton. I still feel betrayed, personally and for my country.
ReplyDeleteThey were SO concerned about "Security".
Who Dat
Loral.
DeleteGood old Bernard Schwartz, of Loral Space, who for about $750,000 got Bill Clinton's Commerce Department to help out the ChiComs with gyro problems they experienced in their MIRVs. Back theny didn't have ability to steal the technology, like today, so now they can do it w/o paying off any US pol...
ReplyDeleteAmen
DeleteNever bought into that Warrior Monk bit. Sounded too much like something dreamed up by an ad agency.
ReplyDeleteAnd, while I would disagree we have "lost" A-stan (a lot of "Conservatives" love to whine we have lost every war since Yorktown) and that Syria is unwinnable (another whine) since The Donald's withdrawal is because he accomplished what he set out to do (Winning IMHO) indicates otherwise, I would submit Mad Dog turned out to be just another Lefty Marine.
PS MacArthur was fired for disobeying a direct order because he wanted to win a war. Mattis resigned because he wanted the military fighting global warming with trans/whatevers.
Not since Yorktown. Just since WWII.
DeleteGenerals have to be politicians to become generals. I never ever trust anyone past Captain.
ReplyDeleteEvery general Officer MUST BE confirmed by the Senate. That alone guarantees that we are getting political generals.
DeleteThere's a difference between Peacetime and Wartime Generals. Wartime Generals are "Get er done!" types that are ill fitted for politics of Peacetime. The Donald is a Wartime politician. We need a guy who can fight because we are in a fight. Guys like Romney are Peacetime politicians who can't get er done against the Democrats and the MSM. They just aren't suited for the fight.
DeleteIndian medical student kicked out of college by racist white professors for questioning their SJW beliefs
ReplyDeleteKieran Ravi Bhattacharya was a medical student at the University of Virginia and he has been kicked out after having questioned his white college professor's SJW beliefs.
Here is the audio of the lecture where he questioned his professor's SJW beliefs:
https://m.soundcloud.com/user-381804527/microagressions-presented-by-amwa
He speaks from 28:45 to 34:00
Here is the audio of the suspension hearing:
https://m.soundcloud.com/user-381804527/asac
Here is a picture of the people who were at the suspension hearing:
https://imgur.com/a/RUvKXNH
Notice how 14 out of the 16 people at that suspension hearing are white people. If this is not an act of racism against a sincere indian medical student, then I don't know what is. Look at their smug arrogant faces as they kick him out for DARING to question their SJW beliefs.
His twitter handle is kieranravib if you want to ask him questions or set up an interview with him
It would be nice to know exactly what this is about without having to go to links. Was he questioning the crap about gender "confirmation"?
DeleteThe med schools and professional societies aee all pozzed as hell about this shit, and much of it is because of the profits to be made by enabling crazy people.
The basic answer is to develop an attitude of "fuck organized medicine" and to learn to hate your doctor. That's right. And you heard it from a physician.
The only way out of this shit is to abolish professional licensing. Without that these shitheads have no power over you.
It sounds to me like a sob story from someone who should have known better, or at least should have been able to read the signs. If he couldn't, he wouldn't have made a very good doctor.
DeleteI deal with the VA healthcare system, and occasionally I have to override my doctors, because I research things and sometimes it seems that I understand the situation more than my doctor. Plus, they have the profit motive for writing prescriptions, whether warranted or not. So far, so good.
- Elric
Explain the "profit motive for writing prescriptions". I practiced for over thirty years and am unfamiliar with that.
DeleteWhat was this kid thinking? Any American student could have told him that colleges here are lefty cesspools where con-conformity is severely punished.
ReplyDeleteNo General's reputation ever survives contact with politics.
ReplyDeleteI read/heard somewhere just recently that a man, who served at the same time as Mattis, said Mattis was never known as "Mad Dog" in the service.
ReplyDeleteNot true... I served with him and he was known as Mad Dog behind his back.
DeleteAll those who rise in the Pentagon are politicians, not military men. Once they're brought into DC the skill set that moves them ahead is melding with the values of the group in power no matter how opposed those values are to the values that distinguished them in the field.
ReplyDeleteSecond, large hierarchies tend toward corruption.
Common sense tells us both things are true.
Where were all these "protestors" when Obama pulled thousands of troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan? I don't remember hearing a word from the rat press corp.
ReplyDelete