All errors should be reported to DonSurber@gmail.com

Monday, May 21, 2018

Russian dossier shows our spies are lousy

Bumbling Bob Mueller's witch hunt is showing the federal system of spies and prosecutors is incompetent. Among other things, Mueller indicted a company that did not exist during the time covered in the indictment. I realize that prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich, but he indicted an imaginary one.

While the abuse of power is an outrage, the level of incompetence of America's spies and the FBI is stunning.

These jokers fell for a wild tale that Donald John Trump hired hookers to pee in a bed the Obamas once slept in.

You wonder what other tales they have fallen for. I now understand the whole weapons of mass destruction claim (quantities of WMD large enough to pose a threat to the Western world). These people are easily bamboozled.

Consider Mueller. He went after the wrong guy in the post-9/11 anthrax case. The real villain was an anthrax expert in the next office over. Gee, do you think he misled Mueller on this one?

That we have given such a nincompoop like Mueller unchecked power is scary.

But equally scary is how incompetent he and his men are.

That Obama spied on Trump goes without saying. Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson laid out the timeline for this Russian Dossier investigation. It begins in 2011, with Obama politicizing the National Security Agency just ahead of his re-election.

"2011: U.S. intel community vastly expands its surveillance authority, giving itself permission to spy on Americans who do nothing more than 'mention a foreign target in a single, discrete communication.' Intel officials also begin storing and entering into a searchable database sensitive intelligence on U.S. citizens whose communications are accidentally or 'incidentally' captured during surveillance of foreign targets. Prior to this point, such intelligence was supposed to be destroyed to protect the constitutional privacy rights the U.S. citizens. However, it’s required that names U.S. citizens be hidden or 'masked' – even inside U.S. intel agencies – to prevent abuse," she wrote.

That is an outrageous power handed over to people who believe in urinating ladies of the night. It's like giving your 7-year-old the keys to your Lamborghini.

Obama immediately abused this power. Given his unadulterated hatred of capitalism and Donald Trump -- who began his birther nonsense about this time -- I think we can assume he was among the first unmasked.

Obama corrupted the spy agencies. But they were broken long before he came upon the scene.

Pissing prostitutes.

These Bozos probably bought the Brooklyn Bridge as well.

23 comments:

  1. One can only imagine the dirt they could have had on Sotero. Except that the abusive spies are all leftists who are/were sympathetic to the cause of Bathhouse Barry. Nothing to see there. Too many real Americans to spy on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm going to make the following prediction: If Obama had a direct hand in this, then after all the dust settles with the FBI, then Trump will be "unmasking" all that he is able to about Barack Obama.

      Delete
  2. Back in 2008 after Obama flip-flopped and voted for the FISA revision that included telecom immunity his followers weren't angry or upset. They said that it was okay because Obama would never abuse power.

    That's some powerful Koolaid.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Raise your hand if you want to see everyone in the Obama administration having anything to do with this hung by the neck until dead with porkskin rawhide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll "second that emotion"!!!!!

      Delete
    2. Oooh yes! Then buried in unmarked graves, never to be seen again!

      Delete
    3. How about having the bodies flown to Rome and unceremoniously thrown into the Tiber?

      Delete
    4. Perp walk them in orange jumpsuits down to the edge of the ocean and then cut their fucking heads off. I got dibs on Obama.

      Delete
  4. I don't think it's accurate to suggest that Mueller and co. were fooled by the dossier. It's more likely that they were all in on the deception, trying to fool us. When we weren't fooled, their plan fell apart. They're still nincompoops, though, for thinking we'd be stupid enough to fall for such nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Don "The John" Trump sure was fixated on the pee pee story.

    "Do I look like a guy who needs hookers?"

    Bad spray tan? Check. Bad combover? Check.

    I'm gonna go with "yes" on the looking like a guy who needs hookers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not even close, dude:

      --This is second part of the Hot Crazy Matrix. This is the guide for women to follow on how they pick their men.--

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WITBBVLAMkQ

      Delete
    2. Not even close, dude:

      --This is second part of the Hot Crazy Matrix. This is the guide for women to follow on how they pick their men.--

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WITBBVLAMkQ

      Delete
    3. Your tears are sweet to us.

      Delete
    4. Barry!
      Does Vjar know you're surfing the internet again!

      You're an hour late for her backend rub! Get going NOW!

      Delete
  6. Did anyone ever check to see if Trump and Obama had actually rented the same suite?

    For that matter, why is a sitting President staying in a hotel rather than in the Embassy?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump wasn't President at thew time IIRC.

      Delete
    2. I think Dan was referring to Obama (hakk! spit!) as the then-sitting Pres who stayed in a hotel room which then-private citizen Trump later supposedly yadayadayada....

      Delete
  7. The pee pee story is just so folk remember, and think more often of Trump & prostitutes. Like Trump haters want to do.

    We normals might like to think the illegal actions by the Dem criminal gov't Deep State would lead to actual punishment.

    When does McCabe get indicted?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Our spies have rarely ever been that good, but Frank Church really did them in.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good post except when you mock birthers.

    After all we know about obama and brennan at this point, nobody with any sense should accept the {UNSEEN} birth certificate until we see an original copy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely! Obama/Soetero is such a fraud, it's impossible to tell what's true about him and what was manufactured.

      Every bit of factual evidence about his birth and origins is hidden away, and that concealment costs millions. There are reasons we don't know about Soetoro, and none of them are good!

      Delete
    2. The modern move is to say something outrageous in order to entrap your opponent into saying something damaging about himself in reply. I'm sure that no one actually thought that Obama was born in Kenya, but you might get some juicy dirt looking at the real birth certificate, like the name of his real father. Plus you made him do something that you wanted him to do, demonstrating control and superiority. Very common tactic and in this environment it's not much to get upset about. Obama certainly could have produced a birth certificate quickly, but preferred not to. I'm not sure why he shouldn't be brought to pay for that mistake, if it was a mistake.

      Delete