All errors should be reported to

Monday, October 23, 2017

Radioactive Democrats

Russia colluded all right. With Hillary. The Democratic Party allowed -- for a price -- Russians to control 20% of our nation's uranium production via a front company in Canada.

The story may finally bring Democrats down

The story has been hiding in plain sight for some time.

On April 23, 2015, Jo Becker and Mike Mcintire of the New York Times reported:
The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Online conservatives have known about this, and have written about it for years.

It seemed like another scandal that the Clintons would survive. Whitewater. Paula Jones. Benghazi. No matter what crimes or mistakes they made, Democrats covered for them.

Not this time.

President Trump beat her before. I believe he can beat her again.

The media already is in its It's-Old-News mode.

From the Daily Caller:
Andrea Mitchell, who hosts her own show on MSNBC and is the chief foreign correspondent for NBC News, claimed that she hasn’t been ignoring the story because she covered it “some years ago.”
“President Trump, at the end there, talking about a story we did do on NBC some years ago,” Mitchell defended.
Rich Noyes, a research director for the Media Research Center, says that coverage was two years ago and only lasted 92 seconds.
But the old news is still news.

From the Times:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
The Clintons are crooks.

They all belong in prison.

Well, maybe not the grandchild.


Please enjoy my books on how the press bungled the 2016 election.

Caution: Readers occasionally may laugh out loud at the media as they read this account of Trump's election.

It is available on Kindle, and in paperback.

Caution: Readers occasionally may laugh out loud at the media as they read this account of Trump's nomination.

It is available on Kindle, and in paperback.

Autographed copies of both books are available by writing me at

Please follow me on Twitter.

Friend me on Facebook.


  1. Well, maybe not the grandchild.

    Serpent's egg.

    1. My thought was nits make lice.

    2. Dragon's teeth.

      They grow into ferocious warriors; OK, that's a stretch considering who their Mamma is, but they'll at least foment disputes.

  2. Even the Times is reporting on something that might be detrimental to the clintons? What's next, a pro-Trump editorial?

    1. Don't hold your breath.

  3. The people who really belong in prison is the upper level management at the DOJ and FBI who hid this scandal. They should have a special place in prison: just across from Bill and Hillary where they always have to look at them. - Elric

  4. The unifying field theory of democrat politics seems to be projection. If they accuse you of something, chances are they've been into it in a big way for a long time. Can't wait until they start going after Republican pedophiles. We'll clean up both ways.

  5. It is like trying to cut down a petrified wood tree with an axe. Hard to fall. I always hope "this is the one that will finally bring the Clintons and other liberals down", but I am always disappointed.
    With the new sheriff in town, I hope it finally happens. This is so big, it would bring many down, and fantastically, including the snakes involved in Mueller's investigation, I mean witch hunt.

  6. There may be some that realize the Ozark Mafia may be expendable, but, if they go, they probably take the Choom Gang with them.

    1. Like that would be a problem?

      All the ballyhoo this past year with dems targeting and destroying huge portions of their party history has been attention consuming. makes me wonder what they were really doing while all eyes have been on the antics.

    2. That's not a bug, that's a bonus feature!

  7. Makes you wonder where the Norks got their fissile material from.

  8. The Clintons are like a greased pig. Every time you think you have the critter caught he slips away again.