Monday, February 20, 2017

Raising taxes will kill the West Virginia Republican Party

"Read my lips: no new taxes" are the six words that killed the first Bush presidency.

Republicans in West Virginia have a once-in-a-century opportunity to reduce state government thanks to the boneheadedness of the Democratic governor, Jim Justice.

Using a playbook that a previous millionaire Democratic governor, Gaston Caperton, used nearly thirty years ago to ramp up taxes, Justice has presented a revenue estimate considerably below expected expenditures. In this case, $4,055,200,000.

Justice wants to spend $4,707,626,000.

He believes he is forcing the Legislature to give him the big tax increase which will anger voters against Republicans.

The Legislature cannot increase that revenue estimate without raising taxes.

But the Legislature can reduce spending, which gives the Republican Party a golden -- nay, platinum -- opportunity to cut the budget.

Instead of demanding another $450 million in tax increases from the second-poorest people in the nation, Republicans must cut spending.

The elimination of entire agencies is possible. There is no reason to fund Mountain Stage, public broadcasting, or the breeder's cup.

Already the Gazette is demanding we spare public broadcasting because its budget is "only" $30 million.

(A side note to lawmakers, if you are pissing off the Gazette, you are doing it right, but you already knew that.)

Now legislators need to look beyond that $4.7 billion general fund for cuts.

The actual spending by the West Virginia state government tops $12 billion. It includes federal money such as the Medicaid program.

Medicaid is too well-lobbied by the medical industry to cut.

For now.

But the $3.5 billion in special revenue accounts are ripe for plucking.

Many of these accounts and agencies serve as little spending fiefdoms for connected Democrats and their families. Most of them have large reserves under control of appointed staff or their boards, and not the people's representatives in the legislature.

Lawmakers need to bring these special revenue accounts back into the mainstream.

Many of these special revenue agencies are over-funded with a large "special revenue" reserve.

Bust these piggy banks before raising taxes.

I would start with the Lottery, which is sitting on (according to the governor's budget) $153,081,580. All told, these agencies have $5,587,062,713 in the bank.

You are going to up taxes by $450 million when you are sitting on 12 times as much money?

I would take a look at all the $5.5 billion sitting in special accounts and re-appropriate it.

The pension funds have a billion invested now. That's not enough. Make it $1.5 billion. Sure. Fully fund the pensions. The $100 million or so a year the state would earn on such an investment would ease the need to kick in as much money into the plan.

And put the money in stock index funds that charge very small fees instead of letting local stock brokers feed off the money.

But any slush funds need to go. Republicans need to ask some simple questions, like: Why is the jail authority sitting on $32,361,522?

Turning that $5.5 billion in "special revenue investments" into a super rainy day fund also will be a buffer against a tax increase. Draining the Lottery of its slush fund alone would reduce the budget gap by $150 million.

This will buy time to make more budget cuts next year.

The Republican Legislature should not fall for the trap of reducing troopers or teachers or any essential services.

Those small offices that offer nice services that are not essential are where the money is. That is where the money is, as well as the power. Be merciless. Don't fall for the "it's only" argument. Cut the luxuries before seeking more from the taxpayers.

The idea that you cannot fix the problem by cutting spending is ludicrous. That's how every taxpayer must do things when you hike their taxes.

Sure, fixing the budget by looking at expenditures will raise a fuss.

But so did Right to Work, and ending Prevailing Wage.

And the Republican majority held.

Make the cuts, and the Republican majority will hold again.

Raise taxes and watch for the return of Democrats for another eight decades. If we are doomed to a socialist government, may as well turn it over to the real socialists.



Kindle is now taking orders. The Kindle version appears on March 1.

"Trump the Establishment" is already available in paperback.

This is the sequel to "Trump the Press," which covered the nomination. It is available on Kindle, or in paperback on Create Space.

Autographed copies are available by writing me at DonSurber@GMail.com

Please follow me on Twitter.

7 comments:

  1. It is simple mathematics. And I'm sure there are big cuts that can be made to DHHR, including Medicaid. - Elric

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Raise taxes and watch for the return of Democrats for another eight decades." You'll get other Repubs to run against those who voted for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't get a lot of things about Demmies, but I especially don't get this: They think taking more money out of people's pockets will lead to prosperity. I mean, what...you think that nicer restaurants will benefit from somebody who now has to live on cold cuts? I don't think it's just misguided. I think they really do want to see us suffer. They're sick like that. Eff the talk about impeaching Trump. IMPEACH JIM JUSTICE.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Call John Kasich next door, Don. He inherited an $8 B hole, cut taxes, fully funded the various pensions, and has a hell of a nice "rainy day" fund. It CAN be done.

    ReplyDelete
  5. After that long, there must be a whole mess of Demoncrat programs to cut.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The fact that WV is sitting on that pile of money is amazing. Problems can be solved without harming the citizens. Should be a no brainer. But many beauracrats have no brains. Good luck.

    I live in one of the poorest counties of the poorest state. Once, We had a windfall of tobacco settlement money. Where did it go? Who knows. We saw no benefits out in plow under country.

    ReplyDelete
  7. There is a reason why the Rs have not proposed one budget which proposes any significant cuts when they took control of the House and Senate more than three years ago. They are "politicians" not "Rs". Plain and Simple. Think about it, in three-plus years, the Rs have not proposed one budget - despite numerous studies, commissions, committees, etc - that offers any of their election promises: massive state agency cuts and massive tax reform. And now they are being shamed by a billionaire who wants to raise taxes cause they cannot provide one alternative budget. "Republicans"? Ha, not hardly. "Clueless" is more accurate.

    ReplyDelete