All errors should be reported to

Thursday, February 09, 2017

Europeans want to ban Muslims

A year after thousands of Muslim men gang raped hundreds of German women attending outdoor celebrations on New Year's Eve, Europeans have had it. They want a ban on immigration from mostly Muslim nations.

A poll by Chatham House of 10,000 Europeans found 54.6% want a ban, and 20.1% do not.

This is a logical reaction to an invasion.

In our survey, carried out before President Trump’s executive order was announced, respondents were given the following statement: ‘All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped’. They were then asked to what extent did they agree or disagree with this statement. Overall, across all 10 of the European countries an average of 55% agreed that all further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped, 25% neither agreed nor disagreed and 20% disagreed.
Majorities in all but two of the ten states agreed, ranging from 71% in Poland, 65% in Austria, 53% in Germany and 51% in Italy to 47% in the United Kingdom and 41% in Spain. In no country did the percentage that disagreed surpass 32%.
Public opposition to further migration from Muslim states is especially intense in Austria, Poland, Hungary, France and Belgium, despite these countries having very different sized resident Muslim populations. In each of these countries, at least 38% of the sample ‘strongly agreed’ with the statement. With the exception of Poland, these countries have either been at the centre of the refugee crisis or experienced terrorist attacks in recent years. It is also worth noting that in most of these states the radical right is, to varying degrees, entrenched as a political force and is looking to mobilize this angst over Islam into the ballot box, either at elections in 2017 or longer term.
Our findings also reveal how, across Europe, opposition to Muslim immigration is especially intense among retired, older age cohorts while those aged below 30 are notably less opposed. There is also a clear education divide. Of those with secondary level qualifications, 59% opposed further Muslim immigration. By contrast, less than half of all degree holders supported further migration curbs.
This is an extraordinary show of support.

Turning Europe into the failed countries these invaders left does no one any good.

Stop it.

Just stop it.


"Trump the Establishment" is an account on how the Establishment used the media to stop the Trump Train in the general election by constantly badgering him on personal issues, often petty. But Trump prevailed based on his abilities as a CEO, and his stances on the real issues of the economy and national security, which I also delve into.

The book is available in paperback Create Space, or if you prefer, or (via Instapundit) Amazon as a paperback.

Kindle will be available March 1.

This is the sequel to "Trump the Press," which covered the nomination. It is available on Kindle, or in paperback on Create Space.


  1. This is how you tell all the smart families came here 140 years ago.

  2. Muslims are not like us. Period. They are sworn enemies. Read the Quran. We need to stop letting them immigrate to Western countries. Then we need to remove the ones that are already here. This is not xenophobia. This is survival. If they stay things will get worse. - Elric

  3. Note that the resistance to immigration comes from the working class. They are the ones with the most to lose. Their jobs are put at risk by the cheap labor, and they are the ones who have to live next door to the filth and violence and suffer the consequences of the actions of their "betters".

    1. Jobs put at risk by cheap labor? You can hardly get a mooslime to do labor let alone menial labor. It is beneath them. Academiacs live in their gated communities shielded from the ebb and flow of the islamics.

    2. I would like to know how many immigrants, especially "Muslim refugees," are receiving government benefits from welfare, food stamps, housing, etc. Another good question has been raised by Judicial Watch. It reports that he U.S. Government has been giving out "loans" to "refugees" to the tune of $545 MILLION in 2016 and more than $2.8 BILLION to “humanitarian assistance overseas.” Judicial Watch wants to know how many of these "loans" are in default. So, the U.S. Government has been paying to bring "refugees" here to resettle and live on the taxpayers' dime. Read the whole maddening story at:

      - Elric

  4. "It is also worth noting that in most of these states the radical right is, to varying degrees, entrenched as a political force and is looking to mobilize this angst over Islam into the ballot box, either at elections in 2017 or longer term."

    The "radical" right is radical only to the Left.

    1. And since 55% of those polled agree with the "radical right", it isn't radical at all, by definition. It's mainstream.

  5. "Stop it."

    They may not be going blind, but if the lights are going out all across Europe, it's rather a moot point, isn't it?

  6. What the hell is wrong with the U.K. and Spin? Did they survey muslims?

  7. This is not the first time Europe has suffered from invasions of the Muslim horde. Yet the minds of their citizens had been wiped clean of those memories by academicians and politicians eager to empower themselves in lucrative posts created from their votes as favored immigrants, selfishly riding the Tiger as a kitten, so to speak. Now, as we see in France,He is hungry and annoyed at his burden. Perhaps they hope the new fence around the Eiffel Tower will keep him at bay.
    Here the Democrats have the same plan but more insidious. They wish to inject voters as rapidly as the courts will allow into areas they have traditionally lost like Texas and the South. The
    voracious termite Ellison has much support for this task.

  8. Nice job, Merkel. Well pkayed!

    Maybe she's a "far right" mole...