As of Tuesday morning, 58% of respondents said Clinton should be named Person of the Year. Trump is in second place with 17% of the vote. gymnast Simone Biles came in third place.
They'll sell more magazines this way.
I started to scan the Time article about Trump and stopped when I realized it is a typical leftist hit job. As for Time picking Trump over Hillary for person of the Year, it's all about the money. - Elric
I've got time, but not for Time.
Time won't give me Time...and it isn't worth paying for. Besides, I wouldn't take it for free.Back when I was in practice they'd send copies free for reception areas for marketing purposes. I threw them away.
Doc, in the immortal words of Bette Midler...Did I ever tell you you're my hero? I wouldn't use Time to wipe my butt after a groaner when we were out of TP. Horrible rag of a mag. They'll be going under soon as more and more of their Sixties Hippie subscribers achieve room temperature...
Heh, doc with the Boy George lyrics :-)And zregime could have attributed "Wind Beneath My Wings" to Lee Greenwood instead of Divine Miss Moonbat.
Does anybody even care?
Is it fair to say that anyone won the popular vote when vote counting stopped prior to completion in most states?Don, I came to you because you spoke the truth. The truth is most states didnt count all the ballots.Once it was obvious Trump won in a landslide the states stopped counting to save money.Only pro-Hilary states continued counting to waste money and create another fake controversy where none existed.libby
I took Don's advice and voted for Hill at TIME. I'm kinda surprised TIME selected Trump; even though that's the right decision, it must have burned their butts to do so.
I pity the Clinton domestic servants today.
Well, Time could hardly feature the face of someone who could stop a clock.
Jill Stein requested a recount.