All errors should be reported to

Friday, November 25, 2016

Reading the Constitution wrong

The Washington Establishment wants President Trump to take an oath of poverty. From the Wall Street Journal down to the lowly CNN, Fake News organizations are demanding President Trump magically divest himself overnight of the $10 billion empire he spent a lifetime building.

They cite the Constitution, screaming Emolument Clause, like Gomer Pyle screaming citizen's arrest.

I wonder if they have read Article II, Section 2, Paragraph 7 of the Constitution:
The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.
So a president is on the payroll and should not receive a dime from any other state or federal government.

Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 8 reads:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
While this article covers Congress, a good Philadelphia lawyer could stretch it to cover presidents.

That is good to know.

Now what does this have to do with the price of pickles in Dublin?

Every president in recent history has had a second source of income.

From the Tax Policy Center last April:
More than 90 percent of the first couple’s income came from the president’s salary—the same $400,000 the country has paid its commander -in-chief since 2001 (reduced this year by a few thousand dollars for some unstated reason). The president also earned about $56,000 in book royalties and only a few hundred dollars from investments. After subtracting contributions to a retirement plan, a deduction for Medicare tax on the president’s income as an author, and $3,000 of capital losses, the couple’s adjusted gross income (AGI) totaled $436,065.
George Washington kept Mount Vernon and took no salary.

If the Founding Fathers meant for him to have no outside income whatsoever, they would not have elected him president twice -- unanimously both times.

Likewise, congressmen and senators, too, have outside incomes. And no one seemed bothered when the King of Norway granted the title (and money) of Nobel Laureate upon President Obama.

But the people have spoken and the Washington Establishment wants to shut them up.

From Media-ite on Wednesday:
During a discussion on CNN this morning, former White House lawyer Richard Painter made the case that if it appears that Trump will be in violation of the emolument clause of the Constitution, then the Electoral College must decide to not vote for him next month.
CNN ran a picture of Nixon with a banner "Trump's Nixonian View of Conflicts of Interest" in teh segment.

More from Media-ite:
Stating that Trump could ease worries if he were to submit to an audit that clause could at least be dealt with, even if other conflicts of interest concerns would still be apparent, Painter insisted Trump would be sending a message that he doesn’t care if he ignores this. He then said the Electoral College would need to take action.
“He needs to comply with the constitution at a bare minimum,” Painter said. “And either recognize the problem and address it.”
“And if he doesn’t do that before the Electoral College meets,” the attorney continued. “I don’t think the Electoral College can vote for someone to become president if he’s going to be in violation of the constitution on day one and hasn’t assured us he’s not in violation.”
Actually, the Electoral College does not meet as a whole body of 538 electors chosen to ruminate about the presidency and vice presidency. The electors meet on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December in the fifty states and D.C. They vote, and then send the results to Vice President Biden -- who is the president of the Senate. At a joint session of Congress, the votes are formally read and accepted.

This nonsense is a signal to the American people that the Washington Establishment will never accept the legitimacy of his election.

How dare we elect someone who wants to put America first, instead of the corporate interests?


"Trump the Press" skewers media experts who wrongly predicted Trump would lose the Republican nomination. I use my deadliest weapon: their own words. "Trump the Press" is available as a paperback, and on Kindle.


  1. They said that Trump would cause a constitutional crisis if he wasn't elected. Look at what they are doing now. They always project. They would like to see Obama in a position where he has some pretext to nullify the election and begin a leftist dictatorship.

  2. The medium invents a problem and then works it's supporters into convulsions that then demand action. When have we seen that tactic used before by the press.

    MSM making fake news up so it has something to use as political propaganda against it enemies. What a horrible business the MSM has become.

  3. They never accepted George W. Bush's election, either. Bunch of cranks...

  4. A few days ago Jamie Dimon the billionaire HC supporter CEO of JPMorgan and no friend of DT said to a CNN reporter that the media wants to manipulate it's viewers by getting them angry or anxious over some non issue in order to make money,and for no other reason. Trump told the NYT he wasn't going to divest himself. He knows the people who voted for him don't care about his business dealings and trust him to not be HC, which was one of the Main issues in the election.Now, more fake due diligence by the now useless press. keeping up this drumbeat of no account could make Trump the real dictator they say they fear but, unlike Nixon, one they cannot bring down

  5. "This nonsense is a signal to the American people that the Washington Establishment will never accept the legitimacy of his election."
    It's a signal to the public to deny the legitimacy of the Washington Establishment. and their media minions.

  6. Emolument Clause? Sounds like Santa's cousin from the backwoods.

  7. Sometimes I think Pol Pot might have had the right idea.

  8. If only they had been so outraged by the Clinton Crime Family Foundation when Crooked Cankles was SecState and was giving quid pro quo to people who donated to it. And you know if Hacking Hillary had been elected prez they would have turned a blind eye to her connections to it. Yeah. BJ and Chelsea would run it and
    Thunder Rodent Thighs would have nothing to do with it. Nudge. Nudge. Wink. Wink. These hacks haven't learned a thing from this election and they are following Rule #2 of Vox Day's Rules of SJWs. They are doubling down.

  9. An emolument is a profit rising from employment or a gift or honor with the restriction being those arising from one of the United States (the president cannot also be an office holder in one of the states) or from a foreign government - no gifts or honors unless Congress approves, i.e. the Nobel Prize.

    Trump's businesses should generate none of those, and the only time to be concerned is when it arises. This is just more bull.

    -Mikey NTH

  10. Nattering nabobs of negativism. If the press makes this much noise even before the inauguration think how much fun we'll have afterward. The Trump presidency is going to be great. - Elric

  11. So now the Constitution matters?