All errors should be reported to

Friday, November 04, 2016

Jury finds Rolling Stone guilty in fake rape story

A federal jury found Rolling Stone and reporter Sabrina Erdely guilty of libeling Nicole Eramo, an administrator at the University of Virginia, in a fake story about a non-existent gang rape.

As libel no longer is a crime in America, the victim had to seek justice through civil litigation.

The jury will determine damages later, but payment will come only after publisher Jann Wenner runs out of appeals or the victim of his libel -- Nicole Eramo -- agrees to settle out of court.

She sought $7.5 million for the defamation. A fraternity libeled by Wenner has a separate libel suit against the magazine and its reporter.

From the Washington Post:
The story opened with a graphic depiction of a fraternity gang rape that went viral online and sent shock waves across the U-Va. campus community. But within days of the article’s publication, key elements of the account fell apart under scrutiny. The magazine eventually retracted the story in April 2015.
Eramo’s lawsuit came a month later, alleging that the magazine’s portrayal of her as callous and dismissive of rape reports on campus was untrue and unfair.
The victim of Rolling Stone's rape of her good name faced tremendous odds in her pursuit of justice.

ABC reported:
According to testimony, that was after Erdely and her editors at the magazine already knew that Jackie was an unreliable source.
In order to find Rolling Stone liable for defamation, the jury believed that Erdely and the magazine acted with actual malice.
In other words, they published the story knowing it contained false information or they acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
Actual malice is a tougher standard for the jury to rule on than negligence. And the jurors have to consider it because a judge ruled that Eramo is a public figure with regards to this case.
Think of this as a product liability from an industry that is well-protected by the federal government, sort of like tobacco was until the Surgeon General's report in 1964.

By the way, these guys at Got News were the first media to report Jackie Coakley lied about being raped.


Hate the media? Love The Donald? "Trump the Press" is the book for you. It skewers media experts with their own words. "Trump the Press" is available as a paperback, and on Kindle


  1. If publishing the story while knowing it was false is not evidence of actual malice, what is?

  2. Actually, the jury found Rolling Stone liable for libel, not "guilty". Defendants may be found guilty in criminal cases; this was a civil case

    1. Yes, in legal terms. But I think guilty better explains the case. To me, this is a crime.

  3. I have mixed feeling about this. On the one hand, I am concerned about the rise of "Lawfare", which SJWs have used to great effectiveness in persecuting those who oppose their Stalinist dreams.

    On the other hand - the actions of Rolling Stone were flat-out evil. If there were true justice in this case Sabrina Erdely and her editors would be financially broke and in prison for what they did.

    The gripping hand is that none of this matters. The verdict will be set aside - period. An Obama-appointed judge will overturn the judgement, or the Justice Department will make trouble, or something will happen. Rolling Stone, like the WaPo, the NY Times, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc. are government-controlled organizations that only exist to promote the Democrat Party's interests. I seriously doubt that Sabrina Erdely and her editors will have to fork over one thin dime, let alone a seven-figure judgement.