Not only that, there is a Hitler under every bed and inside every white male just waiting to burst forth. Suggest a reduction in immigration numbers? Hitler. Suggest a reduction in EBT card handouts? Hitler. Suggest ending aff action? Hitler x 3. These people walk around mumbling "Hitler...." Hitler is everywhere in their demented twisted minds.
This Hitler fellow is starting to sound like an eminently reasonable person - at least by the definitions listed above. - Elric
Rachel Madcow sez she is reading up on Hitler's first few months to prepare for Trump. Between that and screaming "racism!" these people are showing us just how stupid they are.
Most of these people are so busy looking for Dolf, they let dozens of Stalins and Maos walk right past them.Besides, if ever there was a Hitler, the Democrats put up 2 of them, one in '92, one in '08.Sociopaths are great at sucking people in.
Well, we know that Trump is Hitler. So who is Pence - Goring? Goebbels? Ribbentrop?
Newton's Third Law of Political Fencing.They say "Hitler!", you counter with "Stalin!"
I counter with, "Hitler and the Nazis were socialists. That's what Nazi means in English, National Socialists. They were Leftists."
Sshh! They don't want anyone to know that! - Elric
I'm counting on Don to document the two major milestones in the Clinton campaign over the next few months. What I call the "Huh Moment" and the "Oops Moment".
The stupid Left will say almost anything. As with Venezuela now, Germany in Hitler time could amend the constitution directly via the legislature. Our founders made it much harder requiring the states to approve the amendment. The President has no role in the process. My pet peeve is the way Executive Orders have been perverted from tweaking the executive branch to bypassing Congress and the courts. We need a constitutional amendment limiting EOs to their original intent. All EOs are effectively constitutional until the courts intervene; but Andrew Jackson, the first Democrat, moved the Indians (I am one so I can use that noun) off their land in the Trail of Tears which violated a SCOTUS ruling. The internment of the Japanese-Americans during WWII and the seizure of gold by FDR were by EOs. "One Executive Order that has people concerned was issued on March 16th, 2012 by President Obama, EO 13603 (called National Defense Resource Preparedness). Cato Institute Senior Fellow Jim Powell says “This 10-page document is a blueprint for a federal takeover of the economy that would dwarf the looming Obamacare takeover of the health insurance business.”"Should we have executive orders? Past and current supporters of presidents issuing executive orders claim there is constitutional authority, coming from Article II, section 1 (“The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States of America.”) and Article II, section 3 (“The President shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”). If you review the Constitution, though, you will see that there is no specific enumeration anywhere which allows for executive orders.If we are talking about using executive orders to direct executive agencies on implementing Congressional approved legislation, that is reasonable. But if we are talking about using executive orders to create law without Congressional approval, however well-intended, that gives too much power to one person and goes beyond what the founding fathers had intended when they wrote the Constitution."http://ivn.us/2012/05/11/executive-orders-what-the-founding-fathers-wanted/
I would support abolition of Executive Orders. Obama and the left have shown us that communists can get into the presidency, then start using their phone and pen in ways unintended. I believe the Founding Fathers tried to account for possible future ineptitude, but not evil and treason. I believe that obama has signed thousands of these. I think back in "the old days" a president would sign a few of them for things like naming post offices.