All errors should be reported to

Friday, July 17, 2015

Seelling human body parts is OK, but liberals oppose selling animal parts

Two stories, one on the liberal attitude toward selling baby human animal parts, the other on selling animal parts.

Guess which one is protested?

From the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: "The ASPCA is opposed to the killing of live animals for organ donation to other animals. The ASPCA does support ethical practices such as kidney transplant programs in which a kidney is harvested from a carefully selected animal on the condition that the guardian of the animal receiving the kidney must subsequently adopt or arrange for a permanent home for the donor animal."

From Time:
Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards delivered a stern reply on Thursday to a controversial undercover video that purports to show the reproductive health organization profits from selling tissue from aborted fetuses.
In her video response posted to YouTube, Richards said the “heavily edited” footage was intended to make “outrageous claims” about the nonprofit’s programs to help women donate fetal tissue for medical research.
“The allegation that Planned Parenthood profits in any way from tissue donation is not true. Our donation programs, like any other high-quality health care providers, follows all laws and ethical guidelines,” Richards said. “[Women and families’] commitment to life-saving research, developing treatments for diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s is important and compassionate. And it should be respected, not attacked.”
Notice how liberals shape-shifted the issue from the ethics of selling baby body parts to the ethics of earning a profit.


  1. Their claim of a "highly edited" video, may be true, but I highly doubt they'd be happy to see the non-edited video of the whole thing.

  2. Planned Parenthood - Baby Chop Shop

  3. I would imagine that many of those baby parts are used by evil GMO research.